In the two years since the Taliban takeover, the Afghan economy has crumbled, the financial system has largely collapsed, and the international community has opted for unified nonrecognition of the Taliban. Donors and NGOs now face the immense challenge of meeting the needs of the Afghan people under these dire conditions. With an overwhelming majority of Afghans living in severe poverty, and with limited international support, these organizations have had to navigate delicate engagement with an unrecognized government while continuing to provide vital assistance and services.

Recently, the humanitarian situation has only grown more urgent, compounded by the Taliban’s increased restrictions against Afghan female staffers at NGOs. Donors’ priorities are also changing, leading to concerns about a steep drop in funding for humanitarian activities in the country. While nonrecognition serves a purpose, it does not eliminate the enormous humanitarian and economic crisis in the country. In order to effectively respond to the humanitarian crisis, the international community must develop a clear and effective response.

On July 12, USIP, the International Rescue Committee, CARE, and the Norwegian Refugee Council hosted a discussion with distinguished experts and activists to assess the current economic and humanitarian situation in Afghanistan and its impact on the Afghan people. The conversation also explored how the situation could evolve as the Taliban continue to hold power — and what the international community can do to support the Afghan people in light of changing priorities and funding.

Continue the conversation on Twitter using the hashtag #AfghanistanUSIP.

Panelists 

William Byrd, moderator
Senior Expert, Afghanistan, U.S. Institute of Peace

Melissa Cornet
Humanitarian Advocacy Advisor, CARE

Khalid Payenda
Director and co-founder, Institute for Development and Economic Studies (IDEA)

Samira Sayed-Rahman
Director of Policy, Advocacy and Communications, International Rescue Committee

Related Publications

Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Final Report

Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Final Report

Tuesday, May 14, 2024

When announcing the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in April 2021, President Joe Biden identified counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan as an enduring and critical US national security interest. This priority became even more pronounced after the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021, the discovery of al-Qaeda’s leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in Kabul less than a year later, and the increasing threat of the Islamic State of Khorasan (ISIS-K) from Afghanistan. However, owing to the escalating pressures of strategic competition with China and Russia, counterterrorism has significantly dropped in importance in the policy agenda.

Type: Report

Violent Extremism

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Thursday, May 9, 2024

From wars in Ukraine and the Middle East to rising tensions in the South China Sea, there is no shortage of crises to occupy the time and attention of U.S. policymakers. But three years after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, the threat of terrorism emanating from South Asia remains strong and policymakers need to be more vigilant. Indeed, at the end of March, an Afghanistan-based affiliate of ISIS launched a devastating attack outside of Moscow, killing over 140 people.

Type: Question and Answer

Global PolicyViolent Extremism

Despite Daunting Economic Headwinds, Afghan Private Sector Shows Signs of Life

Despite Daunting Economic Headwinds, Afghan Private Sector Shows Signs of Life

Thursday, May 2, 2024

Three years after the Taliban took control of Afghanistan, the country’s economy remains in a dismal state marked by depression-level price deflation, high unemployment and a collapse of GDP. Still, while the bad news for Afghans is well known, less visible are some green shoots in the country’s private sector that, if properly encouraged, could mitigate the situation. These range from small business activity to Taliban plans for major projects to the potential for an uptick in investment. Clearly nothing in those developments can stimulate a strong economic revival.

Type: Analysis

Economics

View All Publications