Q&A: What Works in Preventing Election Violence

Q&A: What Works in Preventing Election Violence

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

By: USIP Staff

The elections this year in the Philippines, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Gabon and even the United States, demonstrate how high-stakes elections frequently trigger anxiety, tension or even violence or the threat of unrest. Properly managed elections allow opposing groups to press their claim to power through a peaceful process. But in fragile democracies, elections frequently feature intimidation or violent protest. U.S. Institute of Peace Senior Program Officer Jonas Claes, editor o...

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal Elections & ConflictDemocracy & GovernanceFragility & Resilience

Q&A: Central African Republic Waiting for Peace

Q&A: Central African Republic Waiting for Peace

Tuesday, December 6, 2016

By: USIP Staff

Nine months after the Central African Republic (CAR) held free, peaceful and democratic elections for president and parliament, the country continues to struggle for stability and progress. Half of the country remains in need of humanitarian aid, and an increase in violent incidents since September threatens to destabilize any progress made to date. At the end of November, clashes between factions of the ex-Séléka, a formerly united alliance of primarily Muslim armed groups, left 85 dead, 76 injured and 11,000 newly displaced.

Type: Analysis

Human RightsDemocracy & GovernanceReligionGlobal Elections & ConflictFragility & Resilience

The Rise and Stall of the Islamic State in Afghanistan

The Rise and Stall of the Islamic State in Afghanistan

Thursday, November 3, 2016

By: Casey Garret Johnson

This report details the structure, composition, and growth of the Islamic State’s so-called Khorasan province, particularly in the eastern Afghan province of Nangarhar, and outlines considerations for international policymakers. More than sixty interviews carried out by The Liaison Office with residents of Nangarhar and provincial and national Afghan security officials informed this report. 

Type: Special Report

Violent ExtremismFragility & ResilienceDemocracy & Governance

 Mosul After ISIS: No Clear Plan for Peace

Mosul After ISIS: No Clear Plan for Peace

Monday, October 31, 2016

By: James Rupert

Two weeks into Iraq’s offensive to recapture Mosul from ISIS militants, the government and its fractious allies have not agreed on how to stabilize and govern the disputed region in the aftermath. The threat of new rounds of conflict, even after a recovery of Mosul from ISIS, is highlighted by the weekend’s surprise advance by Shia Muslim militias, which make up one of at least four main rival forces in the assault. The militia units announced that their fighters had begun a drive on the cont...

Type: Analysis

Violent ExtremismMediation, Negotiation & DialogueFragility & ResilienceReconciliation

Violent Extremism And Clan Dynamics In Kenya

Violent Extremism And Clan Dynamics In Kenya

Monday, October 31, 2016

By: Ngala Chome

Derived from interviews across three Kenyan counties, this report explores the relationships between resilience and risk to clan violence and violent extremism in the northeast region of the country. The research was funded by a grant from the U.S. Agency for International Development through the United States Institute of Peace, which collaborated with Sahan Africa in conducting the study.

Type: Peaceworks

Violent ExtremismFragility & Resilience

Addressing Fragility—A New Learning Agenda

Addressing Fragility—A New Learning Agenda

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

By: Andrew Blum

The Fragility Study Group is an independent, non-partisan, effort of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the Center for a New American Security and the United States Institute of Peace. The chair report of the study group, U.S. Leadership and the Challenge of State Fragility, was released on September 12. This brief is part of a series authored by scholars from the three institutions that build on the chair report to discuss the implications of fragility on existing U.S. tools, st...

Type: Report

Fragility & ResilienceEducation & TrainingGlobal Policy

Preparing for Complex Conflicts

Preparing for Complex Conflicts

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

By: Dr. Robert D. Lamb;  Melissa R. Gregg

The Fragility Study Group is an independent, non-partisan, effort of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the Center for a New American Security and the United States Institute of Peace. The chair report of the study group, U.S. Leadership and the Challenge of State Fragility, was released on September 12. This brief is part of a series authored by scholars from the three institutions that build on the chair report to discuss the implications of fragility on existing U.S. tools, st...

Type: Report

Fragility & Resilience

Implementing a Unified Approach to Fragility: Lessons learned from Burma

Implementing a Unified Approach to Fragility: Lessons learned from Burma

Friday, October 7, 2016

By: Derek Mitchell;  Chris Milligan;  Jessica Davey

The Fragility Study Group is an independent, non-partisan, effort of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the Center for a New American Security and the United States Institute of Peace. The chair report of the study group, U.S. Leadership and the Challenge of State Fragility, was released on September 12. This brief is part of a series authored by scholars from the three institutions that build on the chair report to discuss the implications of fragility on existing U.S. tools, st...

Type: Report

Fragility & ResilienceDemocracy & Governance