A group of Iran analysts previewed their latest research findings in a discussion at the U.S. Institute of Peace co-sponsored by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars on June 27, 2012. Drawn from USIP’s Iran Internal Politics Study Group, six scholars looked at the recent dramatic changes in Iran’s political system and offered their take on what these changes mean for the country, its reform movement, and the United States.

Making Sense of Iran’s Complex Political Changes
Photo courtesy NYTimes
A group of Iran analysts previewed their latest research findings in a discussion at the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) co-sponsored by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars on June 27, 2012. Drawn from USIP’s Iran Internal Politics Study Group, six scholars looked at the recent dramatic changes in Iran’s political system and offered their take on what these changes mean for the country, its reform movement, and the United States.

“The Iran of today is not the Iran of 10 or 15 years ago,” said USIP’s Daniel Brumberg as he opened the discussion. “There has been centralization, but a bargaining process still remains. The system is moving in different ways at different levels.” 


/files/events/Iran/20120627_Iran-6135-MBrief.jpg
(Pictured above, left to right: Shadi Mokhtari, Mehrangiz Kar, Haleh Esfandiari)

According to Brumberg, the office of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei has expanded its powers, and a “new elite” of rural citizens and war veterans has emerged in Iran’s government to challenge the traditional political class. These and other dynamics are shifting Iran’s political and security establishments; making sense of these long-term trends is the goal of the Iran Study Group, said Farideh Farhi. Farhi co-directs the study group with Brumberg. 

Other panelists included Mehrangiz Kar, whose comments focused on the rule of law in Iran; Shadi Mokhtari, who analyzed the discourse and extent of human rights critiques of the government; Kevan Harris, who studied the ways Iran’s welfare policies both empower and control its citizens; and Mehrzad Bourouijerdi, who mapped the extensive connections between Khamenei’s office and the rest of Iran’s government. 

Bernard Hourcade, a visiting public policy scholar at the Woodrow Wilson Center, commented on the presentations by the Iran Study Group experts. Hourcade noted the importance of analyzing demographics and geography in addition to assessing Iran’s political dynamics. The director of the Wilson Center’s Middle East Program, Haleh Esfandiari, moderated each of the three panels.

The Iran Study Group’s findings are scheduled to be released in a book in late 2012.

Explore Further

Related Publications

Democratic Breakthroughs: The Ingredients of Successful Revolts

Democratic Breakthroughs: The Ingredients of Successful Revolts

Friday, July 27, 2012

By: Ray Salvatore Jennings

Although each revolution is different, each successful case of democratic breakthrough shares common domestic and international influences. This report examines 11 cases of past successes at removing autocratic regimes and establishing elections. It then applies its findings to the emerging revolutions of the Arab Spring.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

Finding a Regional Solution for Afghanistan

Finding a Regional Solution for Afghanistan

Monday, April 16, 2012

On April 6, USIP's South Asia Adviser Moeed Yusuf; Abubakar Siddique, senior news correspondent for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty; Shahrbanou Tadjbakhsh, associate researcher at the Peace Research Institute Oslo and professor MPA at Sciences Po in Paris; and Alireza Nader, senior international policy analyst at the RAND Corporation discussed the various problems and potential solutions to improving cooperation and collaboration from Afghanistan's neighbors with the ultimate objective of pro...

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Economics & Environment; Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

View All Publications