The uprising started last year, along with other “Arab Spring” revolutions taking place in Middle East and North African nations. But by far, the Syrian government’s response has become the most deadly and most brutal. The United Nations estimates that more than 8,000 people have been killed since the revolution started last March.

Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad reportedly received advice from Iranian officials on how to handling the country’s deadly uprising, according to new media reports.

The uprising started last year, along with other “Arab Spring” revolutions taking place in Middle East and North African nations. But by far, the Syrian government’s response has become the most deadly and most brutal. The United Nations estimates that more than 8,000 people have been killed since the revolution started last March.

These reports come amid ongoing allegations that Iran has been providing on-the-ground support to the regime’s crackdown. Iran’s government has denied offering anything beyond moral support to its regional ally.

Indeed, the prospects of the toppling of Syria’s Assad regime would have major ramifications for Iran.

Gen. James Mattis, head of U.S. Central Command, testified to Congress earlier this month that Iran was flying weapons and experts into Syria in "a full-throated effort ... to keep Assad there and oppressing his own people."

When Assad falls, he said, "it'll be the biggest strategic setback for Iran in 20 years."

The Iran-Syria alliance poses significant challenges for U.S. diplomacy in the Middle East.

Says USIP’s Daniel Brumberg, ‘The alliance between Syria and Iran is Tehran’s geostrategic lifeline to the Middle East: the fall of the Assad regime could reorder the balance of power in the Middle East, particularly in the context of the region’s ongoing democratic uprisings.”

The significance of the Iran-Syria connection has implications beyond the region to include Iran’s nuclear ambitions: “Replacement of Assad’s autocracy with a democratically elected government would further isolate Iran, thus increasing the chance for a peaceful resolution of the nuclear issue,” observes Brumberg.

Brumberg broadens it out even more, saying, “Iran’s leaders have tried to embrace the Arab Spring and portray it as an extension of their own Islamist vision: but Tehran’s support of Assad has totally discredited this effort to highjack the Arab Spring, thus further isolating Iran from the Arab world. In this sense, the struggle over Syria is a struggle for the very soul of the Middle East and Arab world in particular.

Given the regional and international import of the events in Syria, how should the U.S. proceed in trying to resolve the violence and manage the high stakes?

To address these questions, please join Jay Solomon, foreign affairs correspondent of the Wall Street Journal, and Daniel Brumberg, USIP’s senior adviser in the Center for Conflict Management, on March 21 for a discussion moderated by Steven Heydemann, senior adviser for Middle East Initiatives at the U.S. Institute of Peace.

This is the third in a series of breakfast briefings titled, "A Year of Turmoil: The Arab Awakening and the Path Ahead." The briefings are organized by the United States Institute of Peace in partnership with the Defense Education Forum of the Reserve Officers Association.

Explore Further

Related Publications

Iran’s Attack and the New Escalatory Cycle in the Middle East

Iran’s Attack and the New Escalatory Cycle in the Middle East

Tuesday, April 16, 2024

By: Robin Wright

The Middle East is entering a new phase after unprecedented attacks by Israel and Iran during the first two weeks of April. Robin Wright, a senior fellow at USIP and the Woodrow Wilson Center who has covered the region for a half century, explores what happened, the strategic implications, the political context and the divided world reaction.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

The Growing Flashpoints Between the U.S. and Iran

The Growing Flashpoints Between the U.S. and Iran

Wednesday, April 10, 2024

By: Robin Wright

Tension between Washington and Tehran has been a growing undercurrent of the war in Gaza, even as both countries tried to prevent it from sparking a direct confrontation during the first six months of fighting. Robin Wright, a joint fellow at USIP and the Wilson Center, explores the evolving flashpoints in the world’s most volatile region as well as the challenges for U.S. diplomacy, the new triggers for a wider regional conflagration and the historical backdrop.

Type: Question and Answer

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

The United States Weighs Its Options in the Face of Iran’s Provocations

The United States Weighs Its Options in the Face of Iran’s Provocations

Tuesday, January 30, 2024

By: Sarhang Hamasaeed;  Mona Yacoubian

Three U.S. troops were killed and at least 34 injured in a drone strike on a U.S. base in northeast Jordan on January 28. The attack comes against a backdrop of rising regional tensions since the outbreak of conflict in Gaza following the October 7 Hamas terrorist attack on Israel.

Type: AnalysisQuestion and Answer

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal PolicyViolent Extremism

Making Sense of Iran-Pakistan Cross-Border Strikes

Making Sense of Iran-Pakistan Cross-Border Strikes

Friday, January 19, 2024

By: Asfandyar Mir, Ph.D.

In a surprising turn on January 16, Iran launched missile strikes into Pakistan’s Baluchistan province, claiming it had hit two strongholds of anti-Iran insurgent group Jaish al-Adl (Army of Justice). Iran announced the attack in Pakistan concurrent to its strikes in Iraq and Syria. Less than two days later, Pakistan hit back with not only missiles but also fighter jets in Iran’s Sistan-Baluchistan province — claiming to target hideouts of anti-Pakistan ethno-nationalist insurgents operating from Iranian soil.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal PolicyViolent Extremism

View All Publications