Attempts to revive the stalled peace process bore no fruit in 2011. USIP's Lucy Kurtzer-Ellenbogen recaps 2011 and looks ahead to challenges in 2012.

Attempts to revive the stalled peace process bore no fruit in 2011. USIP's Lucy Kurtzer-Ellenbogen recaps 2011 and looks ahead to challenges in 2012.

 

Overall how do you assess the state of the peace process at the end of 2011?

Attempts to revive the stalled peace process bore no fruit in 2011. Despite U.S. and Quartet efforts to bring Israelis and Palestinians back to the negotiating table, the parties remain locked in stalemate while the surrounding regional order has transformed and remains in flux. The peace process may be at a standstill, yet this has not been a year of quiet in the context of Israeli-Palestinian relations. Succumbing to concern over Palestinian popular sentiment, the Hamas and Fatah leaderships forged an uncomfortable reconciliation agreement, bringing only nominal unity to the Palestinian polity, and deepening concern in Israel over the role that Hamas might play in the future Palestinian leadership.

Meanwhile, Israelis have insisted that a return to the negotiating table be without preconditions, rebuffing the sought-after settlement freeze demanded by the Palestinian leadership of Mahmoud Abbas. The latter, frustrated with perceived Israeli intransigence, followed through on his stated intention to bring a bid for recognition of Palestinian statehood to the U.N. Security Council. The application is pending, though faces likely failure given strong U.S. opposition. Yet, in the meantime, the Palestinians successfully gained admission to the United Nations cultural organization UNESCO, angering Israel and the U.S. who view such appeals to the U.N. as provocative and counterproductive means to circumvent a directly negotiated – and therefore optimal -- solution to the conflict.

In sum, the past year has been marked by a widening distrust between the Palestinian and Israeli leaderships and an inability on the part of international mediators to bridge the divide. As the U.S. enters an election year, it is widely assumed that domestic concerns and preoccupations bode ill for prospects of the current Administration investing heavily in peace process renewal efforts. At the same time, regional turmoil driven by the wave of Arab uprisings seems to argue, analytically, for investment by the parties in the peace process yet in practical terms has engendered enough uncertainty and trepidation – particularly on the part of Israel – that progress remains elusive.

Indeed, 2012 seems set to be a challenging year for Israeli-Palestinian peacemaking. However, as participants in a recent USIP-Baker Institute for Public Policy conference marking 20 years since the Madrid peace conference noted, there are lessons to be drawn from that time period when a starkly and suddenly shifting strategic environment gave rise to a major breakthrough in Middle East peace. In the midst of such historic change in the Middle East lies an opportunity for the Israelis, Palestinians, and also the international community to seize the initiative and take bold action towards shaping the narrative of a changing political landscape in the direction of regional peace.

Explore Further

Related Publications

What Does the U.N. Cease-Fire Resolution Mean for the Israel-Gaza War?

What Does the U.N. Cease-Fire Resolution Mean for the Israel-Gaza War?

Tuesday, March 26, 2024

By: Robert Barron

On March 25, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) passed Resolution 2728, calling for an “immediate” cease-fire in Gaza. The motion’s passage came after weeks of back and forth and posturing among the UNSC’s permanent and rotating members. The exact phrasing of the resolution and its relevance to the situation on the ground, as well as bilateral and multilateral relations — particularly U.S.-Israel ties — have been the subject of heavy public and media attention since Monday, raising questions about the resolution’s subtext, intent and limitations. USIP’s Robert Barron looks at these questions.

Type: Question and Answer

Global PolicyPeace Processes

Plan for Gaza’s Future Highlights the Challenges That Lie Ahead

Plan for Gaza’s Future Highlights the Challenges That Lie Ahead

Thursday, February 29, 2024

By: Lucy Kurtzer-Ellenbogen

The document that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu presented to his security cabinet for discussion on February 22 may be his first formal articulation of a postwar plan for Gaza, but is largely a compilation of views that have been expressed publicly over the past few months. Accordingly, it offers few surprises, but could deepen tensions between Israel on one side and the United States and regional stakeholders on the other. 

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Six Dilemmas Facing Egypt

Six Dilemmas Facing Egypt

Thursday, January 18, 2024

By: Ambassador Hesham Youssef

Since Hamas took control of Gaza in 2007, Egypt has been heavily involved in efforts to end the military confrontations and wars that have periodically broken out in Gaza. However, the scope, scale and stakes of the current war is unlike any prior round of hostilities. In response to the massacre and hostage-taking of mostly Israeli civilians by Hamas and other militant armed groups during their devastating attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, Israel has launched one of the most destructive wars in its history. Indeed, this war will be transformational in numerous ways, with ramifications for several stakeholders beyond the parties themselves.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal Policy

A Slippery Slope? U.S., U.K. Launch Strikes on Iran-Backed Houthis in Yemen

A Slippery Slope? U.S., U.K. Launch Strikes on Iran-Backed Houthis in Yemen

Friday, January 12, 2024

By: Sarhang Hamasaeed

On January 12, the United States and the United Kingdom, supported by Australia, Bahrain, Canada and the Netherlands, launched military strikes against Houthi targets in Yemen in response to the group’s attacks on civilian and military ships in the Red Sea. The U.S.-led strikes are a significant escalation and part of the growing regional impact of the Israel-Hamas war, which the United States has been actively trying to prevent from turning into a regional war.

Type: AnalysisQuestion and Answer

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal Policy

View All Publications