Justice and Security Dialogue brings together stakeholders at the local community level to strengthen rule of law and security by building lines of communication, increasing trust, sharing information, promoting accountability, and providing input on justice and security reform needs and options.

The United States Institute of Peace (USIP) has pioneered a new approach to promoting dialogue and cooperation between civil society, justice and security agencies and political actors in countries emerging from conflict. Geared for countries in transition, out of conflict, or where a fragile peace process is being buffeted by a surge in crime and constant political turmoil, the Justice and Security Dialogue (JSD) program seeks to identify challenges to justice and security, bridge the gulf of mistrust between civilian police and local communities by nurturing communication, cooperation, and recognition that justice and security are two sides of the same coin.

JSD engages a wide variety of actors - including justice and security system stakeholders (both in the government and non-state actors), civil society representatives (including those representing human rights, development, the media, women, and youth), government at both local and national levels, and the country's political parties - in the process of finding joint solutions to shared problems. The long-term goal of JSD is to help enhance public security and usher in a society that respects the rule of law.

The Principle of Justice and Security Dialogue

Justice and Security Dialogue develops in the field. It evolves in response to a country's emerging needs and to a growing recognition of how justice and security are requisites to building peace in a country emerging from conflict. But while JSD has not grown according to a predetermined strategy or blueprint and must be tailored to the context of the country involved, it has from its early days adhered to three general principles that together form JSD's basic methodology:

  • Partnerships - JSD depends on forming a variety of partnerships at different levels: international-national, national-local, police-civil society, and so forth. These partnerships are crucial for three reasons. The ties between partners are sustained and strengthened by constant consultation and by collaboration in the conceptualization as well as implementation of programs. 
  • Process - The process of working together is no less important that the accomplishment of specific goals. By emphasizing an inclusive and transparent process, JSD gives stakeholders the opportunity to set their own objectives and the tools with which to pursue them in a sustainable fashion.
  • Pragmatism - The aim of JSD is not merely to open lines of communication between mistrustful groups but also to increase understanding of the particular justice and security issues of a community, create a sense of accomplishment among participants, and to make a pragmatic difference in people's lives by paving ways forward for parties to mutually engage nonviolently and by documenting the challenges and actions items discussed in the dialogues to increase the sustainability of the resolutions.

JSD introduces stakeholders to techniques and introduces them to ideas and case studies that they may take, adapt for their own context, and apply in the field, thus making a tangible difference in their own lives.

 

Related Publications

To Stabilize Iraq After ISIS, Help Iraqis Reconcile

To Stabilize Iraq After ISIS, Help Iraqis Reconcile

Sunday, February 11, 2018

By: USIP Staff; Nancy Lindborg; Sarhang Hamasaeed

An international conference opens in Kuwait Monday to plan ways to rebuild Iraq and secure it against renewed extremist violence following the three-year war against ISIS. A USIP team just spent nine days in Iraq for talks with government and civil society leaders, part of the Institute’s years-long effort to help the country stabilize. The Kuwait conference will gather government, business and civil society leaders to consider a reconstruction that Iraq has said could cost $100 billion. USIP’s president, Nancy Lindborg, and Middle East program director, Sarhang Hamasaeed, say any realistic rebuilding plan must focus also on the divisions and grievances in Iraq that led to ISIS’ violence and that still exist.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Violent Extremism

Kurdistan and Baghdad: A Tangled Web Over Oil and Budgets

Kurdistan and Baghdad: A Tangled Web Over Oil and Budgets

Tuesday, January 30, 2018

By: Andrew Snow

The economy of Iraq’s semi-autonomous Kurdistan Region is on the brink of collapse; only the central government in Baghdad can stop an economic free fall that’s already damaging the broader Iraqi economy. While a rapid, negotiated solution to this crisis is essential to stabilize and unify Iraq—and reassure investors needed for post-ISIS reconstruction—a host of complex issues over oil and the national budget stand in the way.

Economics & Environment

Reframing the Crisis in Myanmar’s Rakhine State

Reframing the Crisis in Myanmar’s Rakhine State

Monday, January 22, 2018

By: Gabrielle Aron

In the aftermath of attacks by the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army and subsequent military clearance operations, two competing narratives have emerged. One frames the attacks as a critical threat to national security and the majority cultural-religious status quo. The second focuses on the human cost...

Global Policy; Human Rights

As Vice President Pence Visits the Middle East, Hopes for Diplomacy Languish

As Vice President Pence Visits the Middle East, Hopes for Diplomacy Languish

Friday, January 19, 2018

By: Lucy Kurtzer-Ellenbogen

Vice President Mike Pence heads to Egypt, Jordan and Israel with little diplomatic quiet, and even less hope, on the Israeli-Palestinian front. President Abbas has declared the Oslo peace process dead, and the U.S. mediating role over, President Trump has broken with international consensus on Jerusalem, and pointedly not endorsed a two-state solution since coming to office, and Prime Minister Netanyahu has now hedged on his commitment to the end goal of a Palestinian state.

Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

View All Publications