The United States Institute of Peace (USIP) has been working since 2001 to strengthen the rule of law in Afghanistan by identifying peaceful means of dispute resolution, developing partnerships between state and community actors, and improving access to justice. USIP’s work has included learning through research and pilot projects, grant-making, and technical support to the Afghan government, Afghan communities, and international partners. With a Kabul-based field office, USIP has conducted rule of law-related research and pilot projects across all regions of Afghanistan, with active projects or research ongoing in more than 18 provinces.

Afghans herding sheep
Scott Worden

USIP’s current Rule of Law work in Afghanistan is focused on six thematic areas:

Past projects have also engaged civil society in transitional justice and supported other grantees and partners in their documentation efforts.

Dispute Resolution & Informal Justice

Despite progress in strengthening formal justice institutions since 2002, as much as 80 percent of disputes are still resolved outside the formal justice system, typically by shuras, jirgas, mullahs, and other community-based actors.

Since 2002, USIP has been a leader in exploring how these community-based dispute resolution practices might contribute to justice provision and a more stable rule of law environment in Afghanistan. Beginning in 2004, USIP research and analytic pieces have mapped these informal pathways to justice, their relationship with state justice provision, and how they have been affected by conflict and political dynamics. In late 2005 and early 2006, USIP conducted a series of consultations in four different regions of Afghanistan among formal and informal justice system actors to begin a process of dialogue. These processes, together with the initiative of USIP’s governmental and non-governmental partners, led to a policy dialogue process in 2007 through 2009 that attempted to frame the relationship between state and nonstate justice mechanisms.

In provinces across Afghanistan, USIP has tested ways to improve rights protection and expand access to justice within these community-based mechanisms. Pilot projects have also explored ways to improve the durability and sustainability of disputes that are resolved within these community mechanisms, and to increase their ability to tackle disputes that cross district and ethnic lines, among other objectives.

Select Publications:

Land Conflict Resolution

Disputes over land and land grabbing have risen in the last decade, with increasingly few options to sustainably resolve them. If left unresolved, disagreements over land ownership can quickly escalate from a civil dispute to acute acts of violence and criminality and can feed inter-generational conflict.

Through its pilot projects, USIP has sought to identify more sustainable ways of resolving land disputes within community-based dispute resolution by strengthening traditional recording procedures and encouraging linkages with formal titling processes. In 2013, USIP began partnering with land management authorities in the Afghan government to develop and test administrative reforms that might increase land registration and improve land management, but also allowing room for customary dispute resolution or community input to help establish title and resolve ownership disputes.
              
Related publications

Women’s Access to Justice

In the wake of and amidst violent conflict, ensuring women’s access to justice and protection of their rights is a central component to ensuring a stable transition and building a lasting peace.  Yet despite tremendous gains in women’s rights since the fall of the Taliban in 2002, Afghan women still face enormous obstacles in asserting and defending their rights and interests.

Following its research into this area, USIP commenced five pilot projects across six provinces to explore ways for legal aid and justice practitioners to expand outreach to women and help unpack the barriers. USIP is also engaged in support for women’s legal practitioners by bringing together Afghan and Iraqi women leaders to discuss women’s efforts toward peacebuilding in countries in transition.

Related publications:

Islamic Law

Despite the widespread acceptance of Islamic law in Afghanistan, traditional practices are not always consistent with Islamic law. There remains a profound lack of understanding and agreement among Afghan religious leaders regarding what Islamic law actually says about a number of legal matters including, but not limited to, the rights of women, criminal law and procedure, the binding effect of rights enumerated under international law, and the larger body of fundamental rights. 

USIP research has examined the interplay between Islamic Law and customary norms in the resolution of disputes within local justice forums. A specific focus of this research has been how current discourse on Islamic law and its nexus with customary justice is affecting the delivery of justice for women and other vulnerable groups in Afghanistan. USIP has been working to broaden the current understanding of Islamic law and to leverage positive change in communities.

Related publications

Legal awareness & legal education

Rule of law in Afghanistan would be greatly strengthened and better positioned to prevent and mitigate conflict if supported by a backbone of well-educated, informed legal professionals in dialogue with communities that have some level of awareness and appreciation for the rights vested in Afghan law.

USIP has developed pilot projects for youth volunteer networks to provide community-based legal education. Such community-based awareness programs are complemented by USIP’s media portfolio, including media and social networking for the youth volunteers, and a multi-year rule of law radio drama produced with partners Equal Access. Finally, USIP’s International Network to Promote the Rule of Law (INPROL) provides both Afghan rule of law practitioners and more than 2500 practitioners worldwide the tools and research with which to design and implement innovative rule of law reforms.

Related publications

Constitutional Interpretation

One of the key areas for USIP consultation and engagement since 2002 has been constitutional development and interpretation in Afghanistan. Early USIP work provided recommendations on how Afghanistan’s constitutional infrastructure and judicial system would enable or prevent greater stability on the ground. In September 2011, USIP organized a National Conference on Constitutional Discussion. Participating stakeholders, including USIP and partners from the government of Afghanistan, civil society, and academic institutions. The conference highlighted continued ambiguity over critical constitutional and legal issues in Afghanistan, including such fundamental questions as which organ of the Afghan government has authority to interpret the Constitution.

To this end, USIP, through a partnership with the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU), has commissioned a series of articles examining some of core areas identified, including electoral issues, checks and balances, and enforcement of rights. 

Related publications

Related Publications

Aid and Stabilization in  Afghanistan

Aid and Stabilization in Afghanistan

Monday, June 19, 2017

By: Ethan B. Kapstein

The question for international assistance efforts in fragile and conflict-affected countries is the extent to which aid programs are associated with changes in key metrics, including security, popular support for the government, community cohesion and resilience, population health, economic well-being, and internal violence. With an eye to lessons learned for the future, this report examines USAID stabilization programming in Afghanistan, focusing on whether it reduced violence, increased support for the government, and promoted other desirable political and economic outcomes.

Fragility and Resilience; Democracy & Governance; Justice, Security & Rule of Law; Economics & Environment

Fighting Serious Crimes

Fighting Serious Crimes

Wednesday, May 24, 2017

By: Colette Rausch; Editor

Fighting Serious Crimes: Strategies and Tactics for Conflict-Affected Societies is an invaluable resource for anyone battling serious crimes in societies seeking to avoid conflict, to escape from violence, or to recover and rebuild. Packed with practical guidance, this volume includes real world examples from more than twenty of today’s conflict zones, including Libya, Yemen, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, and Colombia.

Justice, Security & Rule of Law

Afghanistan National Defense and Security Forces

Afghanistan National Defense and Security Forces

Friday, May 20, 2016

By: Ali A. Jalali

In the past fourteen years, the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces (ANDSF) have developed into a collection of professional institutions that are both committed to their mission and highly respected. However, they still face major challenges in key areas of capacity, such as logistics, air power, and intelligence. This report assesses the ANDSF’s structure and capabilities and the conditions needed for their long-term financial and operational sustainability.

Justice, Security & Rule of Law

Afghan First Lady: Justice Reform is Hopeful 'Snapshot'

Afghan First Lady: Justice Reform is Hopeful 'Snapshot'

Tuesday, May 17, 2016

By: Fred Strasser

Afghanistan’s first lady, Rula Ghani, countering what she called the “prophets of doom and gloom,” said extensive reforms to her country’s legal system over the past 18 months are beginning to deliver results and illustrate potential progress. Speaking at the U.S. Institute of Peace, Ghani said the unity government headed since January 2015 by her husband, President Ashraf Ghani, and Chief Executive Abdullah Abdullah understand the need to provide fair and effective justice to Afghanistan’s p...

Violent Extremism; Justice, Security & Rule of Law; Democracy & Governance

View All Publications