The senior U.S. diplomat for South and Central Asia, Ambassador Alice Wells, urged Afghanistan’s Taliban to carefully consider last week’s offer by President Ashraf Ghani to hold direct peace negotiations. “It is a positive sign” that the Taliban have not rejected Ghani’s proposal, Wells said—and a planned regional conference in Tashkent this month should rally international support for Ghani’s offer of a political settlement with the insurgency.

“The Afghan people want to maintain their constitutional, legal system, representative democracy and strong ties to the rest of the world,” said Wells, speaking to journalists, current and former officials and other Afghan specialists at the U.S. Institute of Peace. “The question I pose to the Taliban is how will you join this … new Afghanistan, and what positive role are you willing to play to secure its future? Because the best way to determine the answer to these tough questions is at the negotiating table with the Afghan government.”

Wells spoke after returning from Afghanistan and the “Kabul Process” conference at which Ghani made his offer. 

That meeting “was really a landmark event,” Wells said. “President Ghani endorsed a dignified path to a political settlement and put forward a vision of reconciliation that was both credible and detailed. This was a true, pan-Afghan overture to the Taliban” supported not only by Ghani but by all partners in the country’s coalition government and civil society leaders, including women, she said.

Movement in the Afghan Conflict

The Kabul meeting is part of a flurry of diplomacy and public discussion of direct peace talks that have followed months of movement in the conflict. In August, the U.S. administration announced a new strategy to sustain U.S. forces in Afghanistan indefinitely while seeking an Afghan political settlement. In January, the United States suspended military aid to Pakistan over continued support from within Pakistan for Taliban who attack Afghan targets and U.S. troops. In the same month, four terrorist attacks rocked Kabul, killing more than 130 people, and the Taliban and ISIS each claimed responsibility for two of them.

In February, direct peace feelers emerged from both sides in Afghanistan. The Taliban issued an open letter addressed to the American people seeking peace talks with the United States. And last week’s conference in Kabul produced what arguably is the most forward-leaning plan for peace with the Taliban that the Afghan government has ever put forward.The Afghan government’s proposal “is a peace offer that the United States supports and is prepared to facilitate,” Ambassador Wells said today at USIP. She repeated recent statements that the Taliban must talk with the Afghan government rather than the United States. On the Taliban’s longstanding call for a withdrawal of U.S. and other foreign troops, Wells said that American forces are “in Afghanistan as a result of the war. … If the war goes away and the terrorist groups are defeated, obviously the question of our presence can be taken up.”

Critical Regional Actors

USIP analysts and others, such as New York University’s Barnett Rubin, have emphasized the need to gather all of the neighboring states and regional powers around Afghanistan into the overall peace effort, with Pakistan perhaps the most critical of those. 

Despite the U.S. suspension of military aid to the Pakistani government, “we are not walking away from Pakistan,” Wells emphasized, noting that she had met with Pakistan’s foreign secretary yesterday.

Veteran U.S. diplomat David Rank, now a USIP adviser, issued a report this week urging a more energetic U.S. initiative to seek cooperation with China—a key ally of Pakistan—in promoting an Afghan peace process. 

“I think that the role of China is potentially quite important,” Wells said in today’s forum. “We have overlapping interests with China in Afghanistan.”

How Much Hope?

The Afghan specialists gathered at USIP today discussed how much optimism to invest around the current bustle of diplomacy over a peace process. “I think the chances for peace are better today than at any time in the 17-plus years that I’ve been working on this,” said David Sedney, an Afghan scholar at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington and recently the acting president of the American University of Afghanistan.

Afghanistan “has a tendency not to always reward people who express optimism,” said USIP’s Andrew Wilder. “But I do think there’s a risk of being so skeptical that we miss opportunities.

Wells remained measured. To a question about next steps, she noted the plan for a conference in Tashkent, Uzbekistan on March 26 and 27 that is to focus in part on better integrating Afghanistan, notably economically, into the Central Asian region.

“Looking ahead, we have an important opportunity in Tashkent to further underscore to the Taliban this sense of unity … not just among the regional partners but the international partners, the Gulf” states, that the Afghan government peace represents a valid opening that the Taliban should seize, Wells said.

Related Publications

Amid a Spike in Violence, Have Afghan Peace Talks Lost Momentum?

Amid a Spike in Violence, Have Afghan Peace Talks Lost Momentum?

Wednesday, June 19, 2019

By: Johnny Walsh

After rapid progress in early 2019, the Afghan peace process has seemingly slowed. The U.S. chief negotiator, Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad, said in May that his negotiations with the Taliban were making slow but steady progress, but there has been little headway in starting talks among the various Afghan parties. Meanwhile, violence has ratcheted up, as typically occurs in the spring and summer in Afghanistan. The country’s overdue presidential polls are scheduled for late September, further complicating efforts to achieve peace. Can talks succeed amid the violence and political discord? Will the elections drain momentum from the peace process? USIP’s Johnny Walsh looks at the Afghan peace process ahead of the next round of talks in late June.

Peace Processes

Women in Conflict: Advancing Women’s Role in Peace and Security

Women in Conflict: Advancing Women’s Role in Peace and Security

Thursday, June 13, 2019

By: Palwasha L. Kakar

Palwasha Kakar, senior program officer for religion and inclusive societies, testified on June 13 at the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere, Transnational Crime, Civilian Security, Democracy, Human Rights, and Global Women’s Issues' hearing on "Women in Conflict: Advancing Women's Role in Peace and Security.” Her expert testimony as prepared is presented below.

Gender; Peace Processes

Perspectives on Peace from Taliban Areas of Afghanistan

Perspectives on Peace from Taliban Areas of Afghanistan

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

By: Ashley Jackson

Notably absent from the debate around peace in Afghanistan are the voices of those living in parts of the country that have borne the brunt of the fighting since 2001—particularly those living in areas under Taliban control or influence. This report provides insight into how Afghan men and women in Taliban-influenced areas view the prospects for peace, what requirements would have to be met for local Taliban fighters to lay down their arms, and how views on a political settlement and a future government differ between Taliban fighters and civilians.

Reconciliation

Belquis Ahmadi on the Afghan Peace Process

Belquis Ahmadi on the Afghan Peace Process

Thursday, May 16, 2019

By: Belquis Ahmadi

Reflecting on recent conversations in Doha and Kabul, USIP’s Belquis Ahmadi says that Afghans told her they want peace, but are not willing to sacrifice the hard-won gains of the last 18 years to get there. As U.S.-Taliban talks move forward, the extent of the Taliban’s evolution on issues like women’s rights remains in question. “I’ll believe it when I see it,” says Ahmadi.

Gender; Peace Processes

View All Publications