In the summer of 2012, tensions rose between citizens and local authorities in Al-Muthanna Province, a largely tribal and conservative governorate in southwest Iraq. Frequent disputes over poor public services and funding for development projects, as well as corruption allegations, had stalled important initiatives such as a water-and-sewer upgrade and an effort to clear roads of trash. Similar frustrations had led to clashes, deaths and burning of government buildings in neighboring Wasit and Basra provinces.

20140923-Iraqi-Province-grant-highlight.gif

Similarly, in Al-Muthanna Province, officials lacked an effective method to address citizens’ grievances, and exasperated residents began threatening elected provincial and appointed district council members with violence. So a local non-governmental organization (NGO) sought to prevent the tensions from escalating into violence, and intervened to mediate the conflict.

Supported by a USIP grant, the civic group, which is not being named for security reasons, conducted 25 community dialogue forums in 10 districts of Al-Muthanna. These sessions especially focused on rural districts, where tensions tend to be higher than urban areas because of land-ownership disputes. In each of these forums, citizens aired their priorities, needs, grievances and aspirations to members of the local and provincial councils.

The NGO helped establish joint voluntary committees in the 10 districts, each one comprised of tribal leaders or respected local figures and one district council representative, to work together on resolving issues. The NGO also facilitated the signing of memoranda of understanding (MoUs) between district councils and the respective committees to formalize the cooperation and clarify roles and responsibilities. The local committees became responsible for identifying and prioritizing the needs of residents in their areas, and helping address obstacles to the implementation of development projects.

Furthermore, the committees will attempt to mitigate the disruptive effects of tribal or land disputes on the development projects by attempting to resolve issues based on the law.  According to the structures and processes outlined in the MoUs, the joint committees monitor community sentiment, evaluate development projects and make recommendations to the district councils. Although the ultimate executive power remains with the local councils, this arrangement greatly expands the opportunity of ordinary citizens to participate and collaborate on these projects.

The NGO team also conducted 10 public-education sessions on Law 21-2008. The law, previously unknown to many residents of the province, defines the roles and responsibilities of the provincial councils and their relationship to citizens and local council members. District councils are appointed by the elected provincial council, but under the law, local councils can function with minimum direction from the provincial board.  This autonomy allows the district council to expedite projects as needed.

As a result of the NGO’s work with the support of USIP, seven developmental and public works projects were implemented on time and according to the community’s needs and desires. Additionally, the NGO team facilitated a public works project with the United Nations Mission in Iraq (UNAMI) that brought clean drinking water to two rural districts.

Perhaps the most lasting impact of the grant project is the creation of three new advisory positions on the local councils that will provide legal, technical and administrative expertise to the office of project planning at the provincial council in order to expedite future projects.

The NGO’s initiative helped prevent tensions from developing into violent confrontations. It also facilitated greater autonomy for local councils in designing and implementing projects and empowered ordinary Iraqi citizens to participate in the local governance of their province peacefully and within the law.

Related Publications

To Stabilize Iraq After ISIS, Help Iraqis Reconcile

To Stabilize Iraq After ISIS, Help Iraqis Reconcile

Sunday, February 11, 2018

By: USIP Staff; Nancy Lindborg; Sarhang Hamasaeed

An international conference opens in Kuwait Monday to plan ways to rebuild Iraq and secure it against renewed extremist violence following the three-year war against ISIS. A USIP team just spent nine days in Iraq for talks with government and civil society leaders, part of the Institute’s years-long effort to help the country stabilize. The Kuwait conference will gather government, business and civil society leaders to consider a reconstruction that Iraq has said could cost $100 billion. USIP’s president, Nancy Lindborg, and Middle East program director, Sarhang Hamasaeed, say any realistic rebuilding plan must focus also on the divisions and grievances in Iraq that led to ISIS’ violence and that still exist.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Violent Extremism

Kurdistan and Baghdad: A Tangled Web Over Oil and Budgets

Kurdistan and Baghdad: A Tangled Web Over Oil and Budgets

Tuesday, January 30, 2018

By: Andrew Snow

The economy of Iraq’s semi-autonomous Kurdistan Region is on the brink of collapse; only the central government in Baghdad can stop an economic free fall that’s already damaging the broader Iraqi economy. While a rapid, negotiated solution to this crisis is essential to stabilize and unify Iraq—and reassure investors needed for post-ISIS reconstruction—a host of complex issues over oil and the national budget stand in the way.

Economics & Environment

Iraq’s Impasse with Kurds Puts Post-ISIS Stabilization at Risk

Iraq’s Impasse with Kurds Puts Post-ISIS Stabilization at Risk

Thursday, January 11, 2018

By: Andrew Snow

The impasse between Iraq’s central government and its Kurdistan Region is building into an economic problem, and both sides need to quickly find a way to negotiate a solution. While political conflict between the authorities in Baghdad and the regional capital of Erbil has been quieter since Iraqi troops ousted Kurdish forces from disputed territories in October, the Kurdish region’s economy is unraveling, with risks for both sides.

Economics & Environment; Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue; Democracy & Governance

The Middle East: Divided, Dysfunctional

The Middle East: Divided, Dysfunctional

Wednesday, December 13, 2017

By: Garrett Nada

Even before President Donald Trump upended a core U.S. policy recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, late 2017 has been tumultuous in the Middle East. The Islamic State (ISIS) “caliphate” collapsed. Syria’s Assad regime all but won the six-year civil war, consolidating Iranian and Russian influence. Saudi Arabia purged...

Violent Extremism; Global Policy; Democracy & Governance; Fragility and Resilience

View All Publications