The Obama administration’s reaffirmation of American engagement in the Asia-Pacific region for strategic and economic reasons is welcome, but describing it as a “pivot” toward the region in the wake of U.S.-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan neglects the continuity through decades of U.S. involvement in the region, three senior foreign policy figures from the United States, Japan and South Korea said at a forum sponsored by the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) on December 15.

The Obama administration’s reaffirmation of American engagement in the Asia-Pacific region for strategic and economic reasons is welcome, but describing it as a “pivot” toward the region in the wake of U.S.-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan neglects the continuity through decades of U.S. involvement in the region, three senior foreign policy figures from the United States, Japan and South Korea said at a forum sponsored by the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) on December 15.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, in a speech at the East-West Center in Honolulu last month, referred to “America’s pivot toward the Asia-Pacific.” In high-level meetings in the region, President Barack Obama and other administration officials reiterated the theme, which has reverberated widely among the news media and policy analysts on both sides of the Pacific.

USIP’s senior advisor for international affairs, Stephen Hadley, praised Obama’s Asia swing as successful but added, “The whole pivot notion is a little misplaced as a historical matter.” Hadley, the national security advisor in the second term of President George W. Bush, noted , “We have been in Asia for the last 60 years….We are going to be in Asia for a long time.”

Hadley urged stronger U.S. efforts to forge free-trade relationships in the Asia-Pacific, calling it “a region knitting itself together” with such agreements. “My message to any administration is, ‘Get in the game.’”

Ambassador Miyajima Akio, a Japanese diplomat who is serving in the Foreign Policy Bureau at Japan’s Foreign Ministry, lauded the Obama administration’s “reconfirmation of the U.S. commitment to the Asia-Pacific region,” saying it has sent “a very positive message.”

Chung Eui-yong, a former South Korean ambassador and lawmaker, also welcomed Washington’s signals “to get more engaged and more involved” in the region. The United States has continued to be Asia’s “dominant player, in our minds,” said Chung, who is co-chairman of the Standing Committee of the International Conference of Asian Political Parties.

The three offered comments on the U.S. role in Asia, on China’s rise and on dealing with a nuclear-armed North Korea at a USIP public symposium, “Post-2012 Northeast Asia: Challenges & Opportunities for the U.S., Japan and South Korea.” The event was part of USIP’s ongoing Trilateral Dialogue in Northeast Asia (TDNA),  a “Track 1.5” project that has brought together both government and think tank participants from the three countries. U.S. government participants include those from the departments of State and Defense, the National Security Council and congressional staffs. The TDNA initiative has had six rounds of trilateral discussions, with the aim of providing a flexible, nonpartisan mechanism for dialogue on present and future policy.

On China, Hadley said that the U.S. presence in Asia was useful not for containing or surrounding China but rather as a way of reminding Beijing that it needs to pursue legitimate goals in the region and not “throw its weight around.” He described China, along with India, as “surging powers economically and in every other way.”

Chung said South Korea’s view is that China is mostly “a status quo power [that] doesn’t want to see big change.” China is now South Korea’s largest economic partner, and Seoul wants to “try to trust them as much as possible.” Added Chung, “Containing China is not feasible and is not desirable, either.”

All three commentators were pessimistic about efforts to persuade North Korea to bargain away its nuclear weapons and programs.

North Korea “reneged”—as Hadley put it--on a 2005 deal that emerged from six-nation negotiations to denuclearize it in return for diplomatic and economic incentives. [Hadley and the other commentators spoke about possible instability in North Korea just two days before the death of its leader, Kim Jong-il, on Dec. 17.] Now, facing a succession in North Korea from Kim Jong-il to his third son, Kim Jong-eun, Pyongyang probably does not see the present as a time to make a deal, said Hadley. Further, he said that a bipartisan consensus has developed in Washington against paying what he described as “one of the world’s worst regimes” to quit its nuclear drive.

Chung said that past South Korean government policies keyed toward engaging North Korea with incentives had failed to change the North, but the six-party process remains the “only alternative” to resolve the nuclear issue.

Miyajima, for his part, argued that leadership changes in the United States, South Korea and Japan that are certain or at least possible in the coming year are not a barrier to a nuclear deal. Rather, he said, North Korea has yet to make “a strategic decision” to abandon its nuclear weapons, and the three nations must be patient and maintain diplomatic coordination.

The panelists also touched on the question of a North Korean collapse. Hadley said that U.S. officials in the Bush administration attempted to engage Chinese counterparts quietly on the issue but that the effort did not succeed. Chinese policy changed in 2009, he said, apparently reflecting greater concern in Beijing about a North Korean transition than about cooperating with the United States on the nuclear issue. He noted recent growth in Chinese trade with North Korea and statements “defending” the regime in Pyongyang.

A sudden North Korean collapse, said Chung, would be “very unfortunate” for the South, and dramatic change would give a China that is focused on regional stability “a high hand in dealing with the situation.” Given the stakes, “China will not allow it,” Chung said.

Explore Further

Related Publications

Peace Teachers Program

Peace Teachers Program

Friday, December 1, 2023

The U.S. Institute of Peace’s (USIP) Peace Teachers Program is rooted in the conviction that educators can be pivotal in bringing themes of global conflict and peace into their classrooms, schools, and communities.

Type: Fact Sheet

Education & TrainingYouth

U.S.-Vietnam Partnership Goes Beyond Strategic Competition with China

U.S.-Vietnam Partnership Goes Beyond Strategic Competition with China

Tuesday, April 19, 2022

By: Nguyễn Khắc Giang

When the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) was founded in 1967, one of its initial goals was to contain the threat of communism during the Vietnam War. It is a remarkable turn of history that 55 years later, Vietnamese Prime Minister Phạm Minh Chính is coming this year to Washington for the ASEAN leaders summit with President Biden. Vietnam’s accession to ASEAN in 1995 ⁠— the same year when Hanoi and Washington normalized relations ⁠— was the first big step of Hanoi’s “multi-directional” foreign policy. As the Biden administration identifies Vietnam as one of the key countries in its Indo-Pacific Strategy, it needs to recognize Hanoi’s preference for multilateralism in its engagement policy.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Amid Pandemic, Virtual Peace Trail Demonstrates U.S. Commitment to Peace

Amid Pandemic, Virtual Peace Trail Demonstrates U.S. Commitment to Peace

Wednesday, June 2, 2021

By: Ann-Louise Colgan;  Ellie Quinlan

The last year was marked by disruption, with schools shuttered, workplaces closed and so many aspects of daily life altered by the pandemic. While COVID drastically reduced the number of tourists to the capital, too, that did not stop USIP from bringing Washington, D.C. to Americans through virtual options for visiting and experiencing the Peace Trail on the National Mall. The Peace Trail brings a “peace lens” to the experience of visiting the National Mall — elevating stories of key figures, institutions and moments in history that demonstrate America’s commitment to peace.

Type: Blog

Education & Training

View All Publications