USIP has convened and supported a series of meetings of civil society groups to facilitate the articulation of a peace agenda in Colombia.

Paz-Colombia-The-Real-Estreya-flickr.jpg
Courtesy of Flickr/The Real Estreya

Promoting Peace in Colombia: Ideas for the New Administration

On December 2, 2008, USIP hosted an off-the-record meeting of dozens of civil society leaders with the Consultancy for Human Rights and Displacement (CODHES) and Colombia Committee for Human Rights (CCHR).  Representatives of Colombian and U.S. NGOs, U.S. governmental officials, academic institutions, churches, and think-tanks discussed the conflict situation in Colombia and opportunities for a new U.S. administration to support peace in that country.  Numerous follow-up meetings among the civil society leaders and with their constituencies have occurred in Colombia and in Washington. These consultations resulted in a letter to President Barak Obama signed by more than 100 civil society leaders, including religious leaders, indigenous and Afro-Colombian leaders, heads of women’s organizations, academics, a former national peace commissioner, and members of the National Commission for Reparation and Reconciliation.  The letter calls on U.S. policymakers to:

•    Revisit their approach to Colombian drug policy,
•    Help create the conditions for a peaceful and negotiated solution to Colombia’s internal armed conflict,
•    Support the judicial branch and the rule of law,
•    Give priority to human rights
•    Enter into a mutually beneficial fair trade agreement.  


In mid-April, coalition members attended the Summit of the Americas in Trinidad and Tobago, where they met with the presidents of Costa Rica and Uruguay, and the Foreign Ministers of Chile, Honduras, and Ecuador to explore how the international community might support a peace agenda in Colombia.  Members of the coalition plan to return to Washington to present more developed policy recommendations to Administration officials this spring. 

Latest Publications

Moscow Concert Hall Attack Will Have Far-Reaching Impact

Moscow Concert Hall Attack Will Have Far-Reaching Impact

Wednesday, March 27, 2024

By: Mary Glantz, Ph.D.;  Gavin Helf, Ph.D.;  Asfandyar Mir, Ph.D.;  Andrew Watkins

On Friday, terrorists attacked the Crocus City Hall outside Moscow leaving 140 people dead and 80 others critically wounded. Soon after, the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the attack. The terrorist group, which is headquartered in Iraq and Syria, has several branches, including in South and Central Asia. Press reports suggest the U.S. government believes the Afghanistan-based affiliate of the Islamic State, ISIS-Khorasan (ISIS-K), was behind the attack. The Biden administration has publicly noted that it had warned the Russian government of the terrorism threat in early March in line with the procedure of “Duty to Warn.”

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

What Does the U.N. Cease-Fire Resolution Mean for the Israel-Gaza War?

What Does the U.N. Cease-Fire Resolution Mean for the Israel-Gaza War?

Tuesday, March 26, 2024

By: Robert Barron

On March 25, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) passed Resolution 2728, calling for an “immediate” cease-fire in Gaza. The motion’s passage came after weeks of back and forth and posturing among the UNSC’s permanent and rotating members. The exact phrasing of the resolution and its relevance to the situation on the ground, as well as bilateral and multilateral relations — particularly U.S.-Israel ties — have been the subject of heavy public and media attention since Monday, raising questions about the resolution’s subtext, intent and limitations. USIP’s Robert Barron looks at these questions.

Type: Question and Answer

Global PolicyPeace Processes

Angela Stent on the Terror Attack in Moscow

Angela Stent on the Terror Attack in Moscow

Monday, March 25, 2024

By: Angela Stent

While ISIS has claimed responsibility for the devastating terror attack in Moscow, Putin has baselessly tried to shift the blame to Ukraine, says USIP’s Angela Stent: “[Putin] wants to use this to increase repression at home … and also to pursue a more aggressive path in Ukraine.”

Type: Podcast

What’s Driving India-China Tensions?

What’s Driving India-China Tensions?

Monday, March 25, 2024

By: Dean Cheng;  Sameer P. Lalwani, Ph.D.;  Daniel Markey, Ph.D.;  Nilanthi Samaranayake

Since deadly clashes between India and China on their 2,100-mile disputed border — known as the Line of Actual Control (LAC) — nearly four years ago, the two countries have remained in a standoff and amassed an increasing number of troops on either side of the LAC. While India and China have held regular exchanges at the corps commander level since 2020, each side has also continued to militarize and invest in infrastructure in the high-altitude border regions, which may exacerbate risks of clashes or escalation. India-China competition has also deepened beyond the land border, particularly in the Indian Ocean region.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

Three Conditions for Successful Engagement with North Korea

Three Conditions for Successful Engagement with North Korea

Monday, March 25, 2024

By: Mark Tokola

The September 13, 2023, meeting between Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un in Russia’s Amur Oblast marked a significant crippling of the decades-long U.S. pressure-based approach toward North Korea. The strategy of isolating and pressuring North Korea through United Nations Security Council resolutions to compel its nuclear disarmament in exchange for providing normalized relations, economic aid and sanctions relief may or may not ever have been a winning strategy, but now is no longer viable. The strategy required cooperation among the United States, South Korea, China and Russia, but this now seems a distant prospect.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

View All Publications