Dr. Calin Trenkov-Wermuth is the security governance advisor at the U.S. Institute of Peace, where his work focuses on security sector governance and reform. He serves as the Executive Secretary of USIP’s Working Group on Elite Capture and Corruption of Security Sectors. He has over 15 years of professional experience in international affairs, including as a policy advisor and political affairs officer in international organizations, as a researcher at think tanks, and as an academic at universities and colleges in the United States and Europe

Prior to joining USIP, Dr. Trenkov-Wermuth worked at the U.N. Office of Counter-Terrorism, where he was the lead author of the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Coordination Compact. He has also worked in the Office of Rule of Law and Security Institutions at the U.N. Department of Peacekeeping Operations.

Dr. Trenkov-Wermuth has taught international politics at Cambridge University, Columbia University, West Point, NYU, Adelphi University, Hamilton College, Baruch College, and Bard College. Dr. Trenkov-Wermuth was also a visiting fellow at the Norwegian Nobel Institute and the EU Institute for Security Studies, as well as a TAPIR fellow at the RAND Corporation and the Finnish Institute of International Affairs. He started his career at the U.N.’s political affairs department and has also served in the NATO Parliamentary Assembly.

Dr. Trenkov-Wermuth holds a master’s and doctorate in international relations from the University of Cambridge and a bachelor’s in world politics from Hamilton College.

He is the author of “United Nations Justice: Legal and Judicial Reform in Governance Operations” and co-author of “NATO and the Challenges of Austerity” and Overcoming Obstacles to Peace: Local Factors in Nation-Building.” His work has been published in a range of journals and policy-oriented publications, including Foreign Affairs and Washington Post/Newsweek.

Publications By Calin

Ukraine: The EU’s Unprecedented Provision of Lethal Aid is a Good First Step

Ukraine: The EU’s Unprecedented Provision of Lethal Aid is a Good First Step

Thursday, October 27, 2022

By: Calin Trenkov-Wermuth, Ph.D.;  Jacob Zack

Just three days after Russia began its war of aggression against Ukraine, the European Union announced that it would provide weapons to Ukraine through a new financing instrument, the European Peace Facility (EPF), marking the first time in EU history that the bloc provided lethal weaponry. Over the past six months, the EU has provided €2.5 billion to Ukraine through the EPF for arms and equipment, signaling a more muscular EU foreign policy featuring the unprecedented provision of direct military assistance.

Type: Analysis

Justice, Security & Rule of Law

Protecting Civilians in Ukraine Now — and After the War

Protecting Civilians in Ukraine Now — and After the War

Thursday, April 21, 2022

By: Philippe Leroux-Martin;  Calin Trenkov-Wermuth, Ph.D.

From the images of the people summarily executed in Bucha to the remnants of Mariupol’s bombarded theater where hundreds of civilian refugees perished, Russia’s war on Ukraine has unleashed immense suffering on the civilian population. As policymakers debate the most effective forms of support amid Russia’s new offensive in the east and southeast, Ukraine must be provided with the necessary military assistance to fend off Russian aggression. But it will be equally important to immediately start planning for the long term, preparing to offer flexible and multifaceted support to the military and civilian components of Ukraine’s security sector.

Type: Analysis

Justice, Security & Rule of Law

To Consolidate Democracy, Change U.S. Security Assistance

To Consolidate Democracy, Change U.S. Security Assistance

Thursday, December 16, 2021

By: Emily Cole;  Calin Trenkov-Wermuth, Ph.D.

As the United States pursues its initiative to bolster democratic rule and human rights after last week’s Summit for Democracy, a priority should be to diagnose and repair the flaws in U.S. and allied approaches to helping vulnerable nations strengthen their security. Our existing pattern of security sector assistance focuses largely on training and equipping such nations’ forces, and it emphasizes the security of governments and institutions, rather than of the people they are meant to serve. This type of assistance prioritizes short-term tactical gains to the detriment of long-term U.S. strategic goals—and it should be reformed.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & GovernanceJustice, Security & Rule of Law

How Missing Data Can Make the Global Fragility Strategy Work

How Missing Data Can Make the Global Fragility Strategy Work

Thursday, May 20, 2021

By: Michael F. Harsch;  Calin Trenkov-Wermuth, Ph.D.

As glaring inequalities in the global recovery from COVID-19 become clearer, the U.N. has warned of growing risks of political tensions and conflict in many countries. This poses a daunting challenge to U.S. foreign policy and presents a test for the new Global Fragility Strategy (GFS), which aims to reduce state fragility and break cycles of violence in critical regions. What the GFS lacks, however, is a clear “theory of success” that explains why and how proposed actions will lead to desired outcomes in fragile states. A new capacity-based approach is needed to identify fragile states with high potential for effective engagement, particularly security sector reform (SSR).

Type: Analysis

Fragility & ResilienceJustice, Security & Rule of Law

Global Fragility Act: A Chance to Reshape International Security Assistance?

Global Fragility Act: A Chance to Reshape International Security Assistance?

Tuesday, January 19, 2021

By: Calin Trenkov-Wermuth, Ph.D.;  Paul M. Bisca

When the new U.S. administration gets to work, domestic priorities will be front and center on the agenda. Preventing state fragility and violent extremism abroad may seem less urgent. But implementing the Global Fragility Act (GFA)—which aims to fulfill those goals—should remain a top priority. Successfully advancing the GFA would directly benefit U.S. national security and help establish a more values-driven foreign policy. To this end, the United States should work with allies to create a global architecture for security sector assistance built on principles of aid effectiveness adapted from development financing. A U.S.-brokered international consensus on security assistance would help stabilize fragile states, prevent violence, and increase the value of dollars spent on the GFA.

Type: Analysis

Justice, Security & Rule of LawFragility & Resilience

View All