Peacebuilding work matters, but we still struggle to show evidence of where interventions have led to positive outcomes, such as a clear reduction in violence or increased cooperation. The Peacebuilding M&E Solutions Forum is an opportunity for practitioners to come together, network and connect with people working in this space, and share best practices, lessons learned, results, and evidence from across the broad spectrum of M&E activities on peacebuilding programming. This event was co-hosted by the U.S. Institute of Peace and the Alliance for Peacebuilding.

In order to lay the foundation for showing greater evidence, we must overcome the challenge of weak M&E practices in rapidly shifting and complex environments. If we believe that what we do is important and that our work is effective, then we need to prove it to our beneficiaries, donors, and ourselves. The Peacebuilding M&E Solutions Forum sought to begin addressing this need and explore new ways to demonstrate the impact of peacebuilding programming.


9:00am: Greetings & Welcome to Event (AfP, USIP, & OEF) 

9:10am: Morning Panel

  • Improving Research Design (Methodological approaches for evaluations before, during, and after a program is implemented)
  • Improving Data Analysis (Data-based Decision Making for Building and Sustaining Peace)
  • Improving Data Use (Making Research Useful and Used: Lessons from a Mixed-Method Evaluation in Somalia
  • Moderated Q&A

11:15am: Breakout Sessions

  • Impact Evaluations & RCTs
    • Randomized Control Trial Evaluation of Religious Peacebuilding
    • Seriously? RCTs Role in Peacebuilding
    • Evaluating the impact mass and social media programming to alter public perceptions
  • Qualitative Research
    • Measuring the Hard to Measure: Qualitative Rigor
    • Capturing Conversations: Guided Dialogue Observation
    • Sensemaking in Peacebuilding Evaluation
  • Joint Action & Collective Impact
    • Designing Collective Impact for Peacebuilding
    • Collective Monitoring: Lessons from Central African Republic
    • Joint Community Action Plans for Peace-Building in Nigeria

1:30pm: Breakout Sessions

  • Adaptive Management & Evaluation
    • Adaptive Learning: Outcome Harvesting an alternative to results-based programming?
    • Lessons from Experience: Outcome Mapping in Conflict-Affected Contexts
    • Developmental Evaluation: Youth and Community Resilience against VE
  • Participatory M&E
    • Feedback Loops in Inclusive and Participatory M&E
    • Everyday Peace Indicators
    • PhotoVoice : Amplifying Youth Voices
  • M&E Purpose & Quality Assurance
    • The Evolution of the Role of M&E in Peacebuilding Programming
    • Searching for Balance: From Agency Measurement to Program Specifics
    • Data quality assurance: Audio check in complex environments

3:15pm: Breakout Sessions

  • Evaluation & Data Use
    • Evaluation of Early Childhood development program in Rwanda: Research with Children under age 6
    • Promoting and Evaluating Joint Action for Reconciliation Between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Peoples in Saskatchewan, Canada
    • Monitoring for Adaptive Programming: Data to Inform
  • Conflict Monitoring & Early Warning Systems
    • Conflict scan as a quick actionable tool for monitoring conflict
    • The SCORE Methodology Measuring the intangible and predicting peace
    • Community-driven approach to monitoring conflict and Peace projects: A review of BEWERS Monitoring Strategy
  • Theory & Institutional Learning
    • From M&E to Institutional Learning: Progress through University Partnerships (Case study in Kurdistan, Iraq)
    • Theory-based approaches for evaluative program monitoring
    •  Evaluating Across Contexts: Lessons from a Meta-Review Process

Morning Panel

Keith B. Ives
CEO, Causal Design

Jon Kurtz
Director of Research and Learning, Mercy Corps

David Hammond
Director of Research, Institute for Economics and Peace

Andrew Blum
Executive Director, Kroc Institute for Peace and Justice

Beza Tesfaye
Senior Researcher, Mercy Corps

Related Publications

Conflict Prevention in the COVID Era: Why the U.S. Cannot Afford to Go it Alone

Conflict Prevention in the COVID Era: Why the U.S. Cannot Afford to Go it Alone

Wednesday, August 26, 2020

By: Corinne Graff; Laura E. Bailey

As the United States and other international actors assess the wreckage reaped by the coronavirus pandemic around the world, estimates are that an unprecedented level of aid will be needed to mitigate its worst impacts in fragile states. Given the ballooning costs of COVID-response efforts, the U.S. will need to deepen its partnerships with other international donors and local actors to bolster accountable and inclusive institutions and prevent conflicts and violence from escalating. Equally important, but less discussed, these international efforts will need to focus on managing a more complex global risk landscape that is emerging from the pandemic.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Fragility & Resilience; Global Health

America can build peace better—if it includes women.

America can build peace better—if it includes women.

Wednesday, August 19, 2020

By: Amanda Long; Kathleen Kuehnast, Ph.D.

The United States is making a publicly little-noted stride this month to strengthen its response to the violent crises worldwide that have uprooted 80 million people, the most ever recorded. Officials are overhauling America’s method for supporting the “fragile” states whose poor governance breeds most of the world’s violent conflict. Yet the proven new approach—helping these countries meet their people’s needs and thus prevent violence and extremism—will fall short if its implementation fails to include and support women in every step of that effort. Fortunately, an earlier reform to U.S. policy offers practical lessons for doing so.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Fragility & Resilience; Gender

Amid COVID, We Need Enhanced International Coordination to Build Peace

Amid COVID, We Need Enhanced International Coordination to Build Peace

Thursday, July 23, 2020

By: Jonathan Papoulidis; Corinne Graff; Tyler Beckelman

As the humanitarian and economic toll of the COVID-19 pandemic continues to grow, so does the risk that this crisis will fuel new conflicts around the world, while stymying prospects for resolving ongoing ones. The global health crisis is triggering devastating levels of food insecurity and unemployment, especially in the world’s most fragile states, where the social contract between citizens and the state is severed and societies are fragmented and vulnerable to violence. These trends will almost certainly lead to a future spike in instability across these countries, unless concerted international action is taken.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Global Health; Fragility & Resilience

Putting the Global Fragility Act into Action Can Save Money and Lives

Putting the Global Fragility Act into Action Can Save Money and Lives

Thursday, July 2, 2020

By: Corinne Graff; Elizabeth Hume

The U.S. government (USG) is preparing to unveil a new strategy over the coming months to tackle the underlying causes of fragility and conflict in vulnerable countries around the world. The strategy comes at an important time, just as the United States and other international donors seek to respond to rapidly increasing health, food, and other emergency needs as a result of the coronavirus outbreak. It will be critical that in line with the new strategy, this aid does not inadvertently stoke new tensions.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Fragility & Resilience

View All Publications