Specialists in peace processes have understood in recent years that a vital element for ending or preventing warfare is inclusion—ensuring that all groups in a society have their voices heard and their critical concerns met. But what are we learning about how to do that, and do it better? On January 31, veterans of peace processes from Nepal to South Sudan to El Salvador to Turkey discussed the lessons offered by their recent experiences. 

Pictured from left to right, Colette Rausch, Ulas Doga Eralp, Elizabeth Murray, Michael Shipler
Pictured from left to right, Colette Rausch, Ulas Doga Eralp, Elizabeth Murray, Michael Shipler

Speakers at this forum have worked on violent conflicts from across several continents, to build peace processes that are inclusive. Their experiences include: working on “national dialogues,” such as those aimed at stopping civil wars in South Sudan or in Yemen. The case studies also included promoting dialogue and conciliation between the government and minority groups in Turkey, and building a public sense of legitimacy and confidence in a peace process in El Salvador that involved armed opposition groups.

This discussion is part of the Conflict Prevention and Resolution Forum, a consortium of seven Washington-area organizations, including USIP, that have worked since 1999 to share ideas from across disciplines that can improve our ability to manage conflicts and prevent violence. 

A recording of the event can be found on this event page.

Speakers

Achim Wennmann
Executive Coordinator, Center on Conflict Development and Peacebuilding, The Graduate Institute

Jonathan Cohen
Executive Director, Conciliation Resources

Ulas Doga Eralp
Professional Lecturer, School of International Service, American University

Mari Fitzduff
Director, Master of Arts Program in Coexistence and Conflict, Brandeis University

Michael Shipler
Regional Director, Asia, Search for Common Ground

Elizabeth Murray
Senior Program Officer, Middle East and Africa, U.S. Institute of Peace

Colette Rausch, Moderator
Associate Vice President, Global Practice and Innovation, U.S. Institute of Peace

Related Publications

China’s Engagement with Smaller South Asian Countries

China’s Engagement with Smaller South Asian Countries

Wednesday, April 10, 2019

By: Nilanthi Samaranayake

When the government of Sri Lanka struggled to repay loans used to build the Hambantota port, it agreed to lease the port back to China for 99 years. Some commentators have suggested that Sri Lanka, as well as other South Asian nations that have funded major infrastructure projects through China’s Belt and Road Initiative, are victims of “China’s debt-trap diplomacy.” This report finds that the reality is...

Type: Special Report

EnvironmentEconomics

View All Publications