The visit to Kabul of British Prime Minister David Cameron over the weekend provided an opportunity to again raise the issue of the stalled peace talks with the Taliban in Doha. Karzai did not provide clarity on when or whether he would rejoin the talks.

Conundrum on Afghanistan: Karzai Has Little to Gain by Going Back to Doha
Afghan military cadets attend the ceremony where President Karzai and Secretary General of NATO Rasmussen announced the international military coalition handover from NATO to Afghan security forces. Photo Credit: New York Times

In the meantime, the Taliban issued a statement blaming the U.S. for the impasse and accusing it of being in a “state of confusion.” The Taliban were reacting to a statement by Secretary of State John Kerry that the just-opened Doha office might be closed if there was no progress on the talks.

Making any sort of progress will depend on President Karzai’s cooperation. He withdrew from the process after the Taliban used what was intended to be their political office to score propaganda points by making it look like an embassy. An infuriated Karzai withdrew from talks with the Taliban and, for good measure, separate talks with the U.S. about its long-term bases in Afghanistan.

In seeking to portray themselves as a legitimate government, the Taliban also reminded many Afghans what kind of government they used to be. The memories are not fond.

In a tough Wall Street Journal editorial on June 26, Davood Moradian, a former Afghan foreign ministry official and currently the head of the Afghan Institute for Strategic Studies, described how the U.S. support for the Doha formula was viewed by many Afghans: “America’s eagerness to flee Afghanistan has left its civil society feeling betrayed. Natural allies of the U.S.—including the Afghan independent media, women’s rights activists, the private sector, Afghan youth and the Taliban’s political opponents have been cut adrift. The U.S. gave the Taliban a prime propaganda victory in Doha and came away with nothing in exchange.”

The Taliban stunt in Doha and Karzai's reaction have done two things: they have visibly reminded Afghans of the nightmare of Taliban rule, and they have given people a reason to express their views.

Karzai now enjoys a degree of domestic support on this issue that he has not seen in some time, in particular from groups that Mooradian described who have generally been critical of Karzai. Even better for Karzai, this opinion may be directed as much against the U.S. as it is against the Taliban.

All of this suggests that Karzai has a lot to lose by returning to Doha. As I wrote earlier, he was always resistant to the initiative and had to be pressured to accept the opening of the office. To go back would mean not only doing something he is not inclined to do, but squandering significant domestic support in order to do it.

The U.S., meanwhile, is caught in a terrible dilemma. It has invested so much diplomatic capital in the Doha process that it is difficult to give it up just when the hardest part – getting the office opened – had been achieved. But cajoling Karzai back to the table will require even more capital for an uncertain result.

The Taliban statement should be read as a sign of impatience. The opening for negotiations will not last forever.

This should be a case study for future students of U.S. diplomacy, demonstrating as it does the best and the worst of statecraft: the long, patient, discreet diplomacy that led to the opening of the office after a year of effort, and the botched event.

Every student of diplomacy knows how the wrong seat arrangements can set back a negotiation, but there are probably few examples like this, where an unfortunate diplomatic mise-en-scène has sharply curtailed America’s strategic options. A flag, a banner, and a mostly mute Qatari diplomat have vastly complicated America's extrication from Afghanistan.

Scott Smith is deputy director of USIP’s Afghanistan program.

Related Publications

Moscow Concert Hall Attack Will Have Far-Reaching Impact

Moscow Concert Hall Attack Will Have Far-Reaching Impact

Wednesday, March 27, 2024

By: Mary Glantz, Ph.D.;  Gavin Helf, Ph.D.;  Asfandyar Mir, Ph.D.;  Andrew Watkins

On Friday, terrorists attacked the Crocus City Hall outside Moscow leaving 140 people dead and 80 others critically wounded. Soon after, the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the attack. The terrorist group, which is headquartered in Iraq and Syria, has several branches, including in South and Central Asia. Press reports suggest the U.S. government believes the Afghanistan-based affiliate of the Islamic State, ISIS-Khorasan (ISIS-K), was behind the attack. The Biden administration has publicly noted that it had warned the Russian government of the terrorism threat in early March in line with the procedure of “Duty to Warn.”

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

The Challenges Facing Afghans with Disabilities

The Challenges Facing Afghans with Disabilities

Thursday, February 29, 2024

By: Belquis Ahmadi

In Afghanistan, obtaining accurate data on the number of persons with disabilities — including gender-disaggregated information — has always been a challenging endeavor. But based on the data we do have, it’s clear that more than four decades of violent conflict have left a considerable portion of the Afghan population grappling with various forms of disabilities, both war-related and otherwise. And the pervasive lack of protective mechanisms, social awareness and empathy surrounding disability continue to pose formidable challenges for individuals with disabilities, with women being disproportionately affected.

Type: Analysis

GenderHuman Rights

What to Expect from the Doha Conference on Afghanistan

What to Expect from the Doha Conference on Afghanistan

Thursday, February 15, 2024

By: Kate Bateman;  Andrew Watkins

On February 18-19, United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres will convene a meeting on Afghanistan in Doha to discuss the ongoing humanitarian and human rights crises and the recent report on a way forward by U.N. Special Coordinator for Afghanistan Feridun Sinirlioğlu. Special envoys from U.N. member states and international organizations will attend; representatives from Afghan civil society, women’s groups and Taliban officials have also been invited. The conference is a critical, high-level opportunity for donors and the region to chart next steps on how to improve the situation in Afghanistan and engage with the Taliban regime.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

The Latest @ USIP: U.N. Engagement in Afghanistan

The Latest @ USIP: U.N. Engagement in Afghanistan

Wednesday, December 20, 2023

By: Kanni Wignaraja

While some parts of the Afghan economy managed to stabilize in 2023, poverty continued to increase and now stands at 69 percent of the population. Kanni Wignaraja, director for Asia and the Pacific at the U.N. Development Programme, discusses UNDP’s efforts to build resilience in local markets and promote women-owned enterprises in Afghanistan; explores ways to navigate relations with the Taliban; and examines how the decline in international aid is affecting humanitarian efforts in the country.

Type: Blog

EconomicsHuman Rights

View All Publications