Since late 2019, North Korea has rejected U.S. requests for engagement. Even after the Biden administration’s rollout of a “calibrated, practical” approach to diplomacy and its stated willingness to meet “anywhere anytime without preconditions,” the North Korean government has rebuffed U.S. offers of a meeting to brief its policy. Instead, Pyongyang is laser-focused on combatting the spread of COVID and has sought to deepen ties with Beijing to mitigate the pandemic, as well as the effects of global sanctions and a crippled economy. 

North Korea’s unwillingness or hesitation to meet with the United States raises questions about North Korea’s motivations, fears and calculus — as well as whether Washington and Seoul’s best course of action is greater outreach, pressure or patience. On August 4, USIP and the Embassy of the Republic of Korea co-hosted a discussion on the current state of diplomacy with North Korea.

What factors are constraining the potential for engagement? What realistic steps can be taken to minimize those factors and increase the likelihood of productive diplomacy? Can South Korea or China play a helpful role in connecting the two sides? What are the risks of not engaging?

Continue the conversation on Twitter with #NKDiplomacy.

Speakers

Ki-jung Kim
President, Institute of National Security Strategy 

Joseph Yun
Senior Advisor, U.S. Institute of Peace

Gee Dong Lee
Senior Research Fellow, Institute of National Security Strategy 

Moon-soo Yang
Vice President for Academic Affairs and Professor, University of North Korean Studies

Hee-Seung Na
Former President, Korea Railroad Research Institute

Kathleen Stephens
President and CEO, Korea Economic Institute of America

Markus Garlauskas
Non-Resident Senior Fellow, Atlantic Council

Frank Aum, moderator
Senior Expert, Northeast Asia, U.S. Institute of Peace

Related Publications

A Closer Look at Biden’s Indo-Pacific Strategy

A Closer Look at Biden’s Indo-Pacific Strategy

Monday, March 7, 2022

By: Carla Freeman, Ph.D.;  Daniel Markey, Ph.D.;  Vikram J. Singh

On February 11, the White House announced its new strategy for a “free and open Indo-Pacific” region, which pledges support for regional connectivity, trade and investment, and deepening bilateral and multilateral partnerships. USIP’s Daniel Markey, Vikram J. Singh and Carla Freeman analyze the key priorities outlined in the document, and the strategic dynamics between the United States, India and China in the region.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Global Policy

China Is Not Russia. Taiwan Is Not Ukraine.

China Is Not Russia. Taiwan Is Not Ukraine.

Friday, March 4, 2022

By: Andrew Scobell, Ph.D.;  Lucy Stevenson-Yang

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — the most consequential military conflict Europe has witnessed since the Second World War — has riveted the attention of the world. Observers have grappled with the meaning of the act of aggression and scrambled to ponder the wider implications of the war. Almost inevitably people look to draw analogies—both historical and contemporary ones. 

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Conflict Analysis & PreventionGlobal Policy

View All Publications