Error message

Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, a Jordanian career diplomat and leader in international criminal justice, serves as the seventh United Nations high commissioner for human rights. He led in the creation of the International Criminal Court and in the framing of the world’s legal definition of “crimes against humanity.” On Feb. 16, the U.S. Institute of Peace hosted Amb. Zeid as he received the annual Trainor Award from Georgetown University’s Institute for the Study of Diplomacy. Amb. Zeid spoke on “The Impossible Diplomacy of Human Rights.”

Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein

USIP and the Institute for the Study of Diplomacy hosted Amb. Zeid for the annual Raymond ‘Jit’ Trainor Award and Lecture. The Trainor award has been given annually since 1978 “for distinction in the conduct of diplomacy.” Previous recipients include U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan and Dr. Mohamed ElBaradei, director-general of the International Atomic Energy Association. The award is named for Raymond “Jit” Trainor, who over decades as an administrator at Georgetown’s Walsh School of Foreign Service helped oversee the education of countless U.S. and foreign diplomats.

Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, a member of Jordan’s royal family, was appointed high commissioner for human rights in 2014,  the first Muslim, Arab and Asian to fill that role. The Trainor Award will honor him for his years of work to advance the international rule of law in defense of the world's most vulnerable people, and to hold accountable those who violate that law.  A veteran diplomat, he has worked extensively on international criminal justice, U.N. peacekeeping, post-conflict peace-building, international development and nuclear security. He played a central role in the establishment of the International Criminal Court. As advisor to the U.N. secretary-general he developed a strategy for the elimination of sexual exploitation and abuse in U.N. peacekeeping operations. He served as Jordan's permanent representative to the United Nations and as Jordan's ambassador to the United States.

Following his address, Amb. Zeid joined Assistant Secretary Bathsheba Crocker for a conversation about his work, and will respond to questions from the audience. 

Nancy Lindborg
President, U.S. Institute of Peace

Ambassador (ret.) Barbara K. Bodine 
Distinguished Professor in the Practice of Diplomacy and Director of the Institute for the Study of Diplomacy

Frank J. Hogan
Chair, Trainor Lecture Fund Endowment

Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights

Dr. Chester Crocker, Moderator
Professor, Georgetown University’s Walsh School of Foreign Service

Related Publications

To Save South Sudan, Put it on Life Support

To Save South Sudan, Put it on Life Support

Wednesday, July 20, 2016

By: Kate Almquist Knopf; Princeton N. Lyman

South Sudan marked its fifth anniversary as a state this month not with celebrations but with rival armed factions shooting at each other in the streets of the capital. Several hundred people were killed in less than a week, tens of thousands displaced, and even sacrosanct U.N. camps protecting civilians were attacked. South Sudan ceased to perform even the minimal functions and responsibilities of a sovereign state long ago, and today the likelihood of a larger pogrom and escalating civil war is high.

Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue; Human Rights; Global Policy

India-Pakistan Needs Trump Administration’s Focus

India-Pakistan Needs Trump Administration’s Focus

Tuesday, December 27, 2016

By: Fred Strasser

Relations between India and Pakistan are becoming less predictable as nationalist sentiments in India heighten political pressure there to escalate its response to clashes in the disputed territory of Kashmir, specialists on the two states said. The incoming administration of President-elect Donald Trump should develop clearer U.S. policies to ease strains between the nuclear-armed states, the analysts said at the U.S. Institute of Peace. 

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue; Global Policy; Fragility and Resilience

Atrocity Prevention through Dialogue

Atrocity Prevention through Dialogue

Tuesday, August 30, 2016

By: Sofía Sebastián; Jonas Claes

Dialogue with violent extremist groups is a controversial practice, even when used to prevent widespread violence or atrocities. Humanitarian dialogue may serve as a crisis-mitigation instrument, offering short-term relief and civilian protection. When the risk of atrocities is remote, political dialogue can be used for structural or upstream prevention aimed at conflict resolution or addressing community grievances. Though dialogue as a peacebuilding tool has potential in any stage of a conf...

Violent Extremism; Human Rights; Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

View All Publications