When Rufus Phillips III passed away in December 2021, America lost one of its most creative foreign policy thinkers. What made Phillips unique was his 60-year observation of state fragility, starting with his work alongside Edward Lansdale in the 1950s in the Philippines and Vietnam and continuing in El Salvador, Colombia, Iraq and Afghanistan. In all these conflicts, he insisted that there was no amount of force or funding that could supersede a lack of political will on the part of the supported state, and that U.S. efforts should start with helping to nurture that will, generally behind the scenes and at times by staying out of the way.

Phillips worked until his last days to argue for a new approach to failed and fragile states, believing strongly that the issue was crucial for a more stable and humane world order. His final book, “Stabilizing Fragile States: Why It Matters and What to Do About It,” was published posthumously in April. 

The timing of the book’s publication coincided with the launch of the U.S. Strategy to Prevent Conflict and Promote Stability — a U.S. government initiative meant to take the Global Fragility Act (GFA) to the next level. Phillips believed strongly in the GFA’s core premise that improving state stability is a vital national security interest of the United States, and his book offers a new approach to organizing and staffing to manage cases of state fragility and bring nations back to a place of societal and political vitality.  

On May 10, USIP held a discussion of Phillips’ legacy, how insights from his final book can help inform the implementation of the GFA, and the future of U.S. efforts to address state fragility.

Take part in the conversation on Twitter with #PhillipsFragileStates.

Speakers

H.R. McMaster
Fouad and Michelle Ajami Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution; Former U.S. National Security Advisor

Max Boot
Jeane J. Kirkpatrick Senior Fellow for National Security Studies, Council on Foreign Relations 

Roger Myerson
David L. Pearson Distinguished Service Professor of Global Conflict Studies, University of Chicago

Keith Mines, moderator
Director, Latin America Program, U.S. Institute of Peace
 

Latest Publications

A Rising Philippines Faces a Crucial Year Ahead

A Rising Philippines Faces a Crucial Year Ahead

Wednesday, April 24, 2024

By virtue of its geography alone, the Philippines is arguably Southeast Asia’s most strategically important country. Yet its actual influence has tended to lag its potential due to decades of socioeconomic struggle and internal instability, especially in its restive southern island of Mindanao. In recent years, however, the Philippines has rapidly emerged as one of the most consequential countries in the Indo-Pacific, driven in large part by President Ferdinand Marcos’ transformative policies on national security, defense and foreign relations.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

China's Vision for Global Security: Implications for Southeast Asia

China's Vision for Global Security: Implications for Southeast Asia

Wednesday, April 24, 2024

China’s Global Security Initiative (GSI) marks a new phase in Beijing’s ongoing push to change the international security order. Through the GSI, China seeks to establish itself as a counterbalance to U.S. influence and to reshape security management in a number of strategically important regions. The GSI is still in the early stages of implementation, but it has already demonstrated the potential to disrupt the existing security framework in Southeast Asia. This may lead to increased polarization within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), with some member states aligning with the GSI and others remaining cautious due to their stronger affiliations with the United States.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Amid a Changing Global Order, NATO Looks East

Amid a Changing Global Order, NATO Looks East

Tuesday, April 23, 2024

As NATO celebrates its 75th anniversary this year, the Euro-Atlantic security alliance continues to deepen its engagement with Australia, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand, collectively known as the IP4. NATO has collaborated with these countries since the early 2000s, but Russia’s war against Ukraine, security challenges posed by China and renewed strategic competition have led to increased engagement. As the war in Ukraine grinds on and U.S.-China competition shows no sign of abating, the United States has much to gain from collaboration between its allies and partners in the Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

Mental Health and Violent Conflict: A Vicious Cycle

Mental Health and Violent Conflict: A Vicious Cycle

Tuesday, April 23, 2024

When we think about the damage wrought by war, we often think about the physical consequences such as injuries and destroyed infrastructure. However, the often-invisible mental scars left behind by war are no less important.

Type: Analysis

Human Rights

Mirna Galic on NATO’s Long-standing Engagement in the Indo-Pacific

Mirna Galic on NATO’s Long-standing Engagement in the Indo-Pacific

Tuesday, April 23, 2024

Contrary to China’s assertions, NATO has a long history of engagement with the Indo-Pacific. But the alliance’s deep partnerships in the region have taken on renewed importance in recent years amid Russia’s war on Ukraine and renewed strategic competition between the U.S. and China, says USIP’s Mirna Galic.

Type: Podcast

Global Policy

View All Publications