Sports have been used as a way to build trust, teamwork and social cohesion from the international to the neighborhood level for thousands of years.  Scholars and advocates alike assert that it can also serve to improve security, reintegrate traumatized populations, break down stereotypes and reconcile torn societies and groups in the context of violent conflict. On October 26, 2010, USIP held a symposium Tuesday addressing the impact of sports and peacebuilding.

Read the event analysis, Sports as a Metaphor and Tool for Peacebuilding

The United States Institute of Peace held a symposium Tuesday, October 26 on sports and peacebuilding. Sports have been used as a way to build trust, teamwork and social cohesion from the international to the neighborhood level for thousands of years.  Scholars and advocates alike assert that it can also serve to improve security, reintegrate traumatized populations, break down stereotypes and reconcile torn societies and groups in the context of violent conflict.

At the USIP event, three panels of leading experts joined the Institute and an audience of policymakers, nongovernmental organization representatives, academics, athletes, and others involved in the field of conflict management and resolution, to discuss the role of sports in preventing conflict, managing or resolving conflict, and stabilizing a post conflict environment.

The panels included:

  • Panel 1 examined the historical perspective of sports and peacebuilding;
  • Panel 2 focused on the institutions and organizations involved in such sport efforts;
  • Luncheon presentation highlighted U.S. Paralympics activities; and
  • Panel 3 addresseed evaluation of sports’ contribution to peacebuilding.

Speakers 

  • Dr. Victor Cha
    Director of Asian Studies, Georgetown University, Author, “Sports Diplomacy and the Olympics in Asia”, Former Director for Asian Affairs, National Security Council
  • Dr. Dean Ravizza
    Assistant Professor, Salisbury Universitys
  • Eric Dienes
    Liaison Officer, United Nations Office on Sport for Development and Peace
  • Nina Bishop
    Director of International Sports Initiatives Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State
  • Amy Farkas
    Sport for Development Specialist, UNICEF
  • Brendan Tuohey
    Founder, Peace Players International
  • Charlie Huebner
    Chief of Paralympics, United States Olympic Committee
  • Dr. Diana Chigas
    Professor of Conflict Resolution, The Fletcher School, Tufts University and Co-Director, Reflecting on Peace Practice Project, CDA Collaborative Learning Projects
  • Dr. Sarah Hillyer
    Generations for Peace Post-Doctoral Fellow, Georgetown University 
  • Dr. Peter Donnelly
    Professor of Sports Policy,  Co-Editor, “Inside Sports”, University of Toronto
  • Michael Shipler
    Senior Programme Advisor, Search for Common Ground
  • Tara Sonenshine
    Executive Vice President, U.S. Institute of Peace
  • Mike Lekson
    Deputy Provost, Academy for International Conflict Management and Peacebuilding, U.S. Institute of Peace
  • Kathleen Kuehnast
    Gender Adviser, U.S. Institute of Peace
  • Ted Feifer
    Dean of Students and Acting dean of Institutional Outreach,  Academy for International Conflict Management and Peacebuilding, U.S. Institute of Peace

Explore Further


 

Latest Publications

Can Honduras Get Its Democracy in Order in 2025?

Can Honduras Get Its Democracy in Order in 2025?

Thursday, November 7, 2024

Days after accusing the United States of pressuring the Honduran armed forces into removing her from office, Honduran President Xiomara Castro told hundreds of her followers in mid-September that she would not allow “another coup” to happen in Honduras. Her husband, Manuel Zelaya, was ousted in a 2009 military coup. The 112-year-old U.S.-Honduran extradition treaty, she said, was the instrument used by the U.S. to coerce the military into such a plot, justifying her decision to unilaterally end the treaty.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & Governance

Dean Cheng on What China’s Pressure on Taiwan Means for the Region

Dean Cheng on What China’s Pressure on Taiwan Means for the Region

Tuesday, November 5, 2024

As Beijing ratchets up military pressure along the Strait, Taiwan remains “the one area where we are most likely to see … a direct confrontation between the United States and China” because a conflict “would affect a lot of our allies [like] Japan, South Korea and the Philippines,” says USIP’s Dean Cheng. 

Type: Podcast

La transition en Haïti ne peut réussir sans le leadership des femmes

La transition en Haïti ne peut réussir sans le leadership des femmes

Monday, October 28, 2024

Malgré l’instabilité politique et les bouleversements sociaux les plus graves de son histoire au cours de la dernière décennie, Haïti a désormais l’occasion d’aller de l’avant. La sélection d’un Premier ministre efficace par un Conseil présidentiel de transition offre au pays une chance de rétablir la sécurité et d’organiser des élections pour la première fois depuis 2016. Mais pour que les progrès soient durables, il faudra un mélange de leadership transitoire et de leadership transformationnel. Et cela signifie mobiliser et respecter le rôle essentiel des femmes, qui sont actuellement sous-représentées à tous les niveaux de gouvernement et d’influence.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & GovernanceGender

Many Ways to Fail: The Costs to China of an Unsuccessful Taiwan Invasion

Many Ways to Fail: The Costs to China of an Unsuccessful Taiwan Invasion

Tuesday, November 5, 2024

A Chinese invasion of Taiwan would be an extremely difficult military, complex operation. China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has been thinking seriously since the early 2000s about what such a landing would require. For over two decades, its force development efforts have been focused on the weapons, equipment, doctrine and operational concepts required to conquer the island in the face of full U.S. military intervention. The PLA has made considerable progress toward that goal and may deem itself fully capable by the 2027 force development target set by Xi Jinping.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

How Ukraine is Navigating Russia’s Weaponization of Religion

How Ukraine is Navigating Russia’s Weaponization of Religion

Tuesday, November 5, 2024

Since 2014, Ukraine has been trying to repel escalating Russian aggression. But while Russia is a much larger country, with far more weaponry and manpower, their efforts to undermine Ukrainian state sovereignty extend far beyond armed combat. The Kremlin has used its close ties to the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) to weaponize religion in favor of Russian interests.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & PreventionReligion

View All Publications