Error message

With the turmoil in Ukraine shining a new spotlight on security in Europe, will the North Atlantic Treaty Organization refocus itself on collective defense? The U.S. Institute of Peace and Women in International Security hosted a discussion to explore NATO’s future.

Secretary of State John Kerry speaks with Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the Secretary General of NATO, at a ceremony at NATO headquarters in Brussels, April 1, 2014. Photo credit: Jacquelyn Martin/Pool via The New York Times)

Russia's invasion of Crimea poses an urgent and serious challenge for the venerable Atlantic Alliance. Some argue that in response NATO needs to prioritize collective defense, its original mission, and deemphasize the crisis management and cooperative security roles that have involved the Alliance in conflicts from Afghanistan to Libya.

The impact of the Ukraine crisis on NATO's balancing among these three tasks remains to be seen. Will the 28 NATO member countries agree on a common analysis of the threat? What is the role of individual NATO members, and to what extent are they willing to invest in new capabilities? These questions will be at the forefront of September's NATO Summit in South Wales, the first since the 2012 Chicago meeting.

The discussion explored the Alliance's future with four world-renowned NATO experts, including David S. Yost, author of NATO's Balancing Act (Washington, DC: USIP Press 2014).

Copies of NATO's Balancing Act will be available for purchase at the event.


  • Chantal de Jonge Oudraat, President, WIIS, and former Associate Vice President of the USIP Jennings Randolph Fellowship Program

Panel Discussion

  • Michael Brown, Dean of the Elliott School of International Affairs at the George Washington University 
  • Catherine Kelleher, Moderator, Senior Fellow, Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland, School of Public Policy, University of Maryland, and President Emerita of WIIS
  • Gale Mattox, Professor of Political Science, US Naval Academy, and American Institute for Contemporary German Studies
  • David S. Yost, Professor of International Relations, Naval Postgraduate School and author of NATO’s Balancing Act

Related Publications

Identity, Gender, and Conflict Drivers in Pakistan

Identity, Gender, and Conflict Drivers in Pakistan

Tuesday, March 7, 2017

By: Jumaina Siddiqui

Based on a study conducted in the Pakistani town of Haripur that investigated children’s attitudes toward identity, this Peace Brief finds that identity-based divides are in fact not the primary drivers of conflict at the community level, but notes the continuing salience of gender identity, which produces differing social expectations and differing understandings of conflict resolution roles.

Gender; Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Peace Education in Pakistan

Peace Education in Pakistan

Friday, March 3, 2017

By: Zahid Shahab Ahmed

Virtually every country in South Asia faces militancy and conflict to some extent. Pakistan has been especially prone. Peace education addresses the root causes of conflict and is thus a sustainable long-term solution in conflict resolution and prevention efforts. This report examines nine representative peace education initiatives in Pakistan to better understand what types of interventions were most effective, the differences and similarities between peace education programs and curricula in schools and madrassas, and what the peacebuilding field can draw from the selected case studies.

Education & Training; Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Religion

Violent Conflict and Vital Interests: Keeping Focus

Violent Conflict and Vital Interests: Keeping Focus

Thursday, February 16, 2017

By: Fred Strasser

Over the next decade, the United States can expect to face complex foreign challenges from terrorism, insurgencies and internal conflicts fanned by external sponsorship, but the threat of conventional state-on-state wars, including direct assaults on the American homeland, have significantly diminished, according to retired Lt. General Douglas Lute, the former ambassador to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

Global Policy; Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Civilian-Military Relations

China’s Kashmir Policies and Crisis Management in South Asia

China’s Kashmir Policies and Crisis Management in South Asia

Thursday, February 9, 2017

By: I-wei Jennifer Chang

China’s policy on the Kashmir conflict between India and Pakistan has a significant impact on regional stabilization and crisis management efforts in South Asia. Beijing also plays an important third-party role in helping deescalate hostilities between the two countries. This brief discusses the evolution of China’s Kashmir policies over the past several decades and examines Chinese cooperation with the United States during periods of crises between the South Asian rivals. 

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Global Policy

View All Publications