Both DDR and SSR address the heart of the relationship between a state and its people: political control of armed force. What are the connections between DDR and SSR, and how can these be implemented?

Event Summary

Conventional wisdom holds that demobilization, disarmament, and reintegration (DDR) and security sector reform (SSR) are separate and unconnected activities. In truth, they both address the heart of the relationship between a state and its people: political control of armed force.  Ignoring the connection between DDR and SSR risks failure for both programs and increases risks for relapse of violent conflict.  What are the connections between DDR and SSR, and how can these be implemented?

8:30 – 9:00 Registration and Coffee

9:00 – 9:15 Introduction and Welcome

  • Vice Admiral Ann E. Rondeau, United States Navy
    President of the National Defense University and
    Member Ex-Officio, Board of Directors, U.S. Institute of Peace

9:15 – 10:00 Opening Keynote

  • General James Mattis, United States Marine Corps
    Commander, U.S. Joint Forces Command (USJFCOM)

10:00 – 11:00 The Nexus Between DDR and SSR

  • Sean McFate, Relationship between SSR and DDR
    Assistant Professor, National Defense University, College of International Security Affairs (CISA)
  • Ayaka Suzuki, U.N. DPKO Guidance on DDR and SSR
    Chief, DDR Section, United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations (U.N. DPKO)
  • Michelle Hughes, Esq., Relationship between SSR and DDR
    Principal Director, Rule of Law General Dynamics - Information Technology, USJFCOM
  • Daniel Serwer, Moderator
    Vice President, Centers of Innovation, U.S. Institute of Peace

11:15 – 12:30 DDR and SSR: Case Studies

  • Mark Sedra, Afghanistan
    Senior Fellow, Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI)
  • Adriaan Verheul, Sudan
    former Chief of the Integrated United Nations DDR Unit in the United Nations Mission in Sudan (UNMIS)
  • G. Eugene Martin, The Philippines
    Managing Director, Asia Pacific Strategies, and Adviser, U.S. Institute of Peace
  • Lieutenant General David W. Barno, Moderator
    United States Army, Retired, Director, Near East South Asia Center for Strategic Studies

12:30 – 2:00 Lunch and Keynote Speaker

  • Ambassador Jacques Paul Klein,
    Undersecretary-General, United Nations (Retired)

2:00 – 3:30 Reintegration: The “Forgotten R”

  • Mark Knight, Rebel Military Integration and Civil War Termination
    Research and Analysis Officer, Peace Nexus
  • Jacqueline O'Neill, DDR, Gender and Child Soldiers
    Lead Advocacy Coordinator, Institute for Inclusive Security (IIS)
  • Judith Asuni, Consequences of the Forgotten R
    Jennings Randolph Senior Fellow, U.S. Institute of Peace
  • Michael Miklaucic, Justice, Reconciliation and Reintegration
    Director of Research and Editor of PRISM, Center for Complex Operations
  • Scott Moore, Moderator
    Deputy Director, Center for Complex Operations

3:30 – 4:00 Concluding Remarks

Related Publications

Normalizing Sudan-Israel Relations Now is a Dangerous Game

Normalizing Sudan-Israel Relations Now is a Dangerous Game

Thursday, September 24, 2020

By: Payton Knopf; Jeffrey Feltman

With the UAE and Bahrain having joined Egypt and Jordan in declaring peace with Israel, those asking “who’s next?” often look enthusiastically westward, toward Khartoum. Adding new chapters to the Abraham Accords is in the U.S. interest, but so is a successful transition in Sudan. And the sequence of these steps is critical. A unified Sudanese government with a popular mandate will be better able to forge a warm and sustainable peace with Israel, whereas a rushed Israeli-Sudanese agreement has the potential to unravel Sudan’s transition and generate renewed support for Sudan’s Islamists and their foreign backers.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Democracy & Governance; Global Policy

China’s Response to Sudan’s Political Transition

China’s Response to Sudan’s Political Transition

Friday, May 8, 2020

By: Laura Barber

Sudan's decades-long economic relationship with China has almost always been dominated by oil. Yet this relationship has changed significantly in the past decade—first with the loss of oil reserves when South Sudan became an independent nation in 2011, and more recently due to the ouster of longtime ally President Omar al-Bashir. This report, based on interviews with policy officials, diplomats, industry and security experts, and others, examines China’s evolving commercial and political interests in this vital nation in the Horn of Africa.

Type: Special Report

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Sudan, One Year After Bashir

Sudan, One Year After Bashir

Friday, May 1, 2020

By: Manal Taha; Payton Knopf; Aly Verjee

Dictator Omar al-Bashir, who ruled Sudan for nearly three decades, was overthrown in April 2019. After months of protests, negotiations led to a joint civilian-military transitional government to govern the country for a period of 39 months. However, Sudan’s political transition remains tenuous, and even before the coronavirus pandemic, the risks of failure were many. USIP’s Manal Taha, Payton Knopf, and Aly Verjee discuss the past year in Sudan and the need for further international support to shore up the transition.

Type: Analysis and Commentary

Democracy & Governance; Global Health

COVID-19 and Conflict: Horn of Africa

COVID-19 and Conflict: Horn of Africa

Thursday, April 30, 2020

By: Susan Stigant

USIP is closely following the effects of the novel coronavirus around the world and we’re particularly concerned about its effects in fragile states and conflict zones, which are especially vulnerable to the impacts of these kinds of outbreaks. This week, our Susan Stigant looks at what new challenges have emerged in the Horn of Africa since the outbreak began.

Type: Blog

Global Health

View All Publications