The Pakistani government banned more than 200 groups as extremist or terrorist organizations last year in a significant move to stop the spread of ideological, religious and political extremism that can feed violent conflict. But many ideologically extreme groups still operate openly, with evidence suggesting there is consistent recruiting and engagement with university students. In Sri Lanka, Buddhist ideological extremism fuels negative attitudes about minority ethnic and religious groups. On November 28, U.S. Institute of Peace Jennings Randolph Fellow Rabia Chaudry and other experts discussed the findings of her research on these trends.

A youth displays his support for the Muslim League with a green flag on his bicycle, as seen through the window of a shop, in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, May 8, 2013. General elections in Pakistan are scheduled to be held on Saturday to elect a new parliament.
Photo Courtesy of The New York Times/Tyler Hicks

Ideological extremism, radicalization and militancy in Pakistan’s Southern Punjab has been the focus of concern for years. The Pew Research Center’s Social Hostilities Index, which measures acts of religious animosity by individuals, organizations and social groups, rated Pakistan the highest in such antagonism. In Sri Lanka, the Social Hostilities Index stands at 8.3 and has risen steadily since 2007. 

One factor in each case might be persistent efforts by extremist organizations to involve young people. Chaudry’s research project was designed to study whether and how contact across faiths and sectarian divides among college-age youth reduces participation in ideologically extreme groups or belief in negative narratives about people who are different. Continue the conversation on Twitter with #InterfaithCVE.


Rabia Chaudry, Presenter and Moderator
Jennings Randolph Fellow, U.S. Institute of Peace

Ayub Ayubi, Panelist
Founder, Renaissance Foundation (Mashal-e-Rah), Pakistan

Georgia Holmer, Panelist
Director of Countering Violent Extremism, U.S. Institute of Peace

Susan Hayward, Panelist
Director of Religion and Inclusive Societies, U.S. Institute of Peace

Related Publications

India-Pakistan Tensions Test China’s Relationships, Crisis Management Role

India-Pakistan Tensions Test China’s Relationships, Crisis Management Role

Thursday, March 7, 2019

By: Jacob Stokes; Jennifer Staats

The latest India-Pakistan crisis has put China in a difficult position, as it tries to balance its relationships with both countries, while helping to stave off a conflict and demonstrate its ability to manage and resolve crises. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi spoke to leaders in both Pakistan and India last week, urging them to practice restraint and find a way to deescalate the situation. Despite Pakistan’s request for China to play a more active role, competing priorities constrained the degree to which Beijing could lead—highlighting a chronic challenge for Chinese diplomacy in South Asia. China’s decision to keep a low profile is likely deliberate and in keeping with longstanding practice, but it is inconsistent with Beijing’s aspirations to lead in Asian crisis diplomacy.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

Amb. Richard Olson on the India-Pakistan Crisis

Amb. Richard Olson on the India-Pakistan Crisis

Wednesday, March 6, 2019

By: Richard Olson

Last week, tensions between India and Pakistan—sparked by a suicide attack claimed by a Pakistan-based terrorist group—put the world on notice. “The United States has reached a point where it believes that the militants operating out of Pakistan are … a threat, not just to India and to Afghanistan and our forces in Afghanistan, but … a threat to the long-term stability of the Pakistani state,” says Richard Olson, a former U.S. ambassador to Pakistan.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

What Can be Done to Calm the India-Pakistan Crisis?

What Can be Done to Calm the India-Pakistan Crisis?

Wednesday, February 27, 2019

By: Moeed Yusuf

On February 14, in the disputed region of Kashmir, a suicide bomber rammed into a convoy of Indian paramilitary police, killing 44. The attack was claimed by the Pakistan-based Islamist group Jaish-e-Mohammad and was the deadliest bombing in Kashmir in three decades. Nearly two weeks after the attack, India launched a retaliatory airstrike. USIP’s Moeed Yusuf examines how the U.S. and international partners are key to preventing further escalation that could lead to nuclear war.

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

View All Publications