Error message

Cambodia’s 1991 peace accord launched a process of cease-fire, peacekeeping and rebuilding that stabilized the country, but left deep wounds still unhealed from the 1970s genocide and decades of war. The Cambodian peace process was one of the first of its scale undertaken by the international community after the Cold War—and a quarter-century of work to implement it offers lessons for current and future peacebuilding work, both in Cambodia and worldwide.

Cambodians returning from refugee camps in Thailand aboard a UNHCR (Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees) train as it approaches Phnom Penh. June 1992
Photo Courtesy of U.N. Photo/Pernaca Sudhakaran

Cambodia's 1991 peace accords cemented arrangements for a cease-fire, peacekeeping and rebuilding that stabilized the country, but left deep wounds still unhealed from the 1970s genocide and decades of war. The Cambodian peace process was one of the first of its scale undertaken by the international community after the Cold War. A quarter-century of work to implement the terms offers lessons for current and future peacebuilding, in Cambodia and worldwide. Since a political crisis in 2013-2014 over disputed elections, analysts also have debated how the country can consolidate democracy and advance reconciliation before the next national election, 20 months away. On December 15, USIP will host a discussion on the Paris Peace Accords of 1991, the state of their implementation, and the path ahead for the country's 15 million people.

Two panels will discuss how the accords were achieved, political tensions since then, lessons that might be drawn from Cambodia's experience for other peace processes, and what role the international community might play going forward to preserve the peace and the intent of the accords.

Opening Remarks
9:00-9:15

Nancy Lindborg
President, U.S. Institute of Peace 

Panel 1: Lessons
9:15-10:30

Ambassador Mark Storella
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration, U.S. Department of State

James A. Schear
Global Fellow, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars
Visiting Professor, Peacekeeping & Stability Operations Institute, U.S. Army War College

Priscilla Hayner
Transitional Justice Scholar

Ambassador Derek Mitchell, Moderator
Senior Advisor, U.S. Institute of Peace


Panel 2: Implementation
10:45-12:00

Thun Saray
President, Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC)

Brad Adams
Asia Director, Human Rights Watch 

James Turpin
Human Rights Officer, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights

Scott Worden, Moderator
Director, Afghanistan and Central Asia Programs, U.S. Institute of Peace

Related Publications

 Colombia Considers War and Memory

Colombia Considers War and Memory

Wednesday, October 14, 2015

By: Fred Strasser

A breakthrough in peace talks last month between Colombia’s government and the country’s biggest guerrilla group cements the role of victims in the process and has been hailed as a possible model for resolving conflicts elsewhere. Yet after 50 years of violence, a political accord on how to deal with the millions victimized by the war is just the first step. Hardened, bitter memories will risk rekindling conflict. Colombian peacebuilders say the way forward depends on an effective justice sys...

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue; Reconciliation; Peace Processes

How to Foster Peace in Iraq After ISIS

How to Foster Peace in Iraq After ISIS

Monday, February 13, 2017

By: Fred Strasser

When Iraqi tribal leaders were forced to flee the city of Hawija in northern Iraq as the Islamic State seized the area in 2014, they weren’t much concerned with advancing the rule of law. But last year, as ISIS’s grip weakened and the possibility of returning to Hawija grew nearer, the leaders faced the prospect of an aftermath stained by revenge killings of collaborators and demand for “blood money” in compensation. Such tribal justice could set off new rounds of violence and instability.

Violent Extremism; Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue; Peace Processes; Religion

Cooling Iraq’s Conflict With Community Dialogue

Cooling Iraq’s Conflict With Community Dialogue

Thursday, January 12, 2017

The violence of extremists—and the chaos they spawn—takes place in towns, villages, streets and homes, not along some far-off front line. That’s where extremist groups seek recruits and where residents they victimize plot revenge, said the U.S. Institute of Peace’s Sarhang Hamasaeed in a Ted Talk-style presentation during the Jan. 10 “Passing the Baton” conference. While national and international efforts to bring peace to such areas can help, dialogue and mediation at the community level has...

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue; Violent Extremism; Religion; Fragility and Resilience; Democracy & Governance

India-Pakistan Needs Trump Administration’s Focus

India-Pakistan Needs Trump Administration’s Focus

Tuesday, December 27, 2016

By: Fred Strasser

Relations between India and Pakistan are becoming less predictable as nationalist sentiments in India heighten political pressure there to escalate its response to clashes in the disputed territory of Kashmir, specialists on the two states said. The incoming administration of President-elect Donald Trump should develop clearer U.S. policies to ease strains between the nuclear-armed states, the analysts said at the U.S. Institute of Peace. 

Conflict Analysis & Prevention; Mediation, Negotiation & Dialogue; Global Policy; Fragility and Resilience

View All Publications