The U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) and the non-profit Partnership for a Secure America (PSA) on September 27 held the first meeting in their “Congressional Briefing Series--Topics on International Conflict Resolution and Prevention.”

USIP, PSA Commence Congressional Briefing Series

The U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) and the non-profit Partnership for a Secure America (PSA) on September 27 held the first meeting in their “Congressional Briefing Series--Topics on International Conflict Resolution and Prevention.”

The educational, off-the-record briefings are designed to provide opportunities for congressional staff to engage with leading experts and fellow Capitol Hill staffers in bipartisan forums. The program aims to equip staff with new perspectives on critical issues in the international conflict resolution and prevention field, encourage bipartisan dialogue and build cross-party relationships.

The first briefing featured Andrew Wilder, USIP’s director of Afghanistan and Pakistan programs, and David Kilcullen, a counterinsurgency expert who advised Gen. David Petraeus in Iraq and Afghanistan and is now president of Caerus Associates. The well-attended event prompted a substantive discussion.

USIP, the independent, nonpartisan conflict management center created by Congress, runs a range of conflict-management and peacebuilding programs in Afghanistan. PSA is a nonprofit organization founded by former Rep. Lee Hamilton and former Sen. Warren Rudman to advance bipartisanship on critical national security and foreign policy issues.


Related Research & Analysis

Understanding the Implications of the Taliban’s Opium Ban in Afghanistan

Understanding the Implications of the Taliban’s Opium Ban in Afghanistan

Thursday, December 12, 2024

The Taliban’s opium ban, coupled with Afghan farmers’ replacement of poppy largely with low-value wheat, is likely to worsen dissatisfaction and political tensions. The Taliban’s persistence in enforcing the ban has been notable, especially in 2024. If the ban remains in place, it would demonstrate the regime’s strength but also worsen rural poverty, increase dissatisfaction among landholders and spur political instability. This will likely lead to increased humanitarian needs and more pressures for outmigration to nearby countries and beyond, both of which are of interest to the U.S. and other Western countries. Conversely, if the ban weakens in response to pressures and resistance, a revival of widespread poppy cultivation could undermine the regime’s authority. Aid alone will not offset the economic shock of the ban, nor stimulate the long-term growth needed to effectively combat the opium problem.

Type: Analysis

How Afghanistan’s Economy Can Survive Shrinking Shipments of U.N. Cash Aid

How Afghanistan’s Economy Can Survive Shrinking Shipments of U.N. Cash Aid

Thursday, November 14, 2024

Afghanistan’s precarious economy is facing a new set of multidimensional risks as humanitarian aid — delivered in massive shipments of U.S. cash dollars — shrinks rapidly amid competing demands from other crises around the world. The dollar inflows, moved under U.N. auspices, have helped stabilize the Afghan economy, cover its mammoth trade deficit, and inject monetary liquidity into commerce. With much smaller cash infusions, in line with a general reduction in aid, the suffering of Afghanistan’s poverty-stricken population is likely to increase.

Type: Analysis

View All Research & Analysis