On April 25, 1998, the United States Institute of Peace conducted a meeting of its Bosnia Working Group to discuss the future of Serbia and the Milosevic regime.  The Institute's objective is not to reach consensus within the group, but to explore issues and options.

About the Report

On April 25, 1998, the United States Institute of Peace conducted a meeting of its Bosnia Working Group to discuss the future of Serbia and the Milosevic regime. The working group is composed of representatives from government agencies, think tanks, and nongovernmental organizations who are experts on Balkan matters. Chaired by the former U.S. Ambassador to Bosnia-Herzegovina John Menzies, the working group has met consistently throughout 1997-98 to discuss issues of implementing the Bosnia peace agreement. Recognizing that Bosnia cannot exist as a viable, democratic state unless it is embedded in a region that is itself stable and democratic, the Institute has begun discussions on Balkan-wide prospects for political and economic development.

The Institute's objective is not to reach consensus within the group, but to explore issues and options. Herein is a summary of the working group's discussion by Senior Fellow Daniel Serwer, Program Officer Lauren Van Metre, and Research Assistants Kristine Herrmann and Albert Cevallos.

The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Institute of Peace, which does not advocate particular policies.

Related Publications

Dislodging Putin’s Foothold in the Balkans

Dislodging Putin’s Foothold in the Balkans

Thursday, June 1, 2023

By: Harun Karčić;  Peter Mandaville, Ph.D.

The impact of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on the Balkans can only be understood by considering Moscow’s malign influence in the region from a broader perspective. While Russia has specific objectives related to each individual country in the region, its overall objective is clearly to target the Western Balkans through a divide and rule approach, using multiple tools of influence. While the United States and its European partners focus on the war in Ukraine, Russia is taking the opportunity to nibble away at NATO’s borders and to sow discord in countries hoping to some day present a strong case for joining the European Union.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Education and Training in Nonviolent Resistance

Education and Training in Nonviolent Resistance

Wednesday, October 5, 2016

By: Nadine Bloch

Civil society around the world has demonstrated the ability to bring about change without violence. Critical to civil society’s success is preparing communities to undertake safe and strategic nonviolent action (NVA) movements. Previous research on NVA has focused on three broad methodologies: protest and persuasion, noncooperation, and intervention. This Report contributes to the knowledge on NVA by highlighting key strategic functions and outcomes of education and training–a fourth and crit...

Type: Special Report

Education & TrainingNonviolent Action

NATO’s Balancing Act

NATO’s Balancing Act

Friday, January 17, 2014

NATO's Balancing Act evaluates the alliance’s performance of its three core tasks—collective defense, crisis management, and cooperative security—and reviews its members’ efforts to achieve the right balance among them. Yost considers NATO's role in the evolving global security environment and its implications for collective defense and crisis management in the Balkans, Afghanistan, Africa, Libya, and elsewhere.

Type: Book

View All Publications