The purpose of the meeting was to see if this diverse gathering of Somali professionals could develop consensusre commendations about how to promote more effective relief efforts in Somalia and how to advance toward political reconciliation and reconstruction  Given their divergent perspectives, the group was able to achieve an impressive degree of consensus on key points. The purpose of this report is to summarize these points of consensus.

Highlights:

A group of prominent Somalis, meetings as a Study Group of the U.S. Institute of Peace, on November 18, 1992, made the following recommendations regarding international intervention in Somalia:

  • The international community providing relief must have the authority, the resolve, and the military means to deliver relief supplies without obstruction.
  • It should be made clear to local factions that the international community has no intention of recolonizing Somalia or of transforming Somalia into a UN trusteeship.
  • Close contact must be maintained between international military and relief officials and local factions and leaders.
  • Careful attention must be given to the varying conditions prevailing in different parts of the country, and the relief efforts need to be adapted to local circumstances.
  • International assistance needs to be provided at an early stage to help organize local and regional police forces.
  • The existing international arms embargo must be enforced more vigorously, with appropriates sanctions imposed.
  • The U.N. needs to be more active in facilitating dialogue and promoting political reconciliation both within and among various political  parties and factions in Somalia. Dialogue across regional lines can come after reconciliation advances further within regions.
  • The question of whether Somalia should be a single state or divided into two states in need not be a preoccupying issue at this moment, since the survival of the Somali people takes priority.

Related Publications

Somalia’s Critical Transition Comes amid al-Shabab and Hunger Challenges

Somalia’s Critical Transition Comes amid al-Shabab and Hunger Challenges

Wednesday, June 1, 2022

By: Susan Stigant

On May 15, Somali legislators selected former president Hassan Sheikh Mohamud to reprise the chief executive role he played from 2012-2017. The vote marks a critical transition for Somalia and in the Horn of Africa, particularly after the election was delayed by two years and marred by corruption and violence. President Hassan Sheikh will return to power in a country seemingly splitting at the seams, amid a devastating drought, a metastasizing terrorist threat and a fractious political scene. Meanwhile, President Biden has decided to redeploy U.S. troops to fight the terrorist group al-Shabab, reversing a move made by President Trump at the end of his term.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & GovernanceViolent Extremism

Why the U.S. Needs a Special Envoy for the Red Sea

Why the U.S. Needs a Special Envoy for the Red Sea

Tuesday, October 23, 2018

By: Payton Knopf

The Trump administration has appointed four special envoys to coordinate U.S. policy toward key hot spots: Iran, North Korea, Syria, and Afghanistan. Yet in the Red Sea—one of the most volatile and lethal regions of the world afflicted by several interconnected conflicts and rivalries that pose significant challenges to American interests—U.S. policy has been rudderless in large part due to the absence of a similar post.

Type: Analysis

Global PolicyConflict Analysis & Prevention

View All Publications