As South Sudan prepares to declare its independence on July 9, political leaders and legal specialists there have been working for months to prepare a transitional constitution that will create a framework for South Sudan’s transformation from an autonomous region to an independent state.

As South Sudan prepares to declare its independence on July 9, political leaders and legal specialists there have been working for months to prepare a transitional constitution that will create a framework for South Sudan’s transformation from an autonomous region to an independent state.

The South Sudanese have received important technical help in the crucial endeavor of constitution-making from a number of outside experts, including from the United States Institute of Peace (USIP). USIP has been serving as an adviser to a body known as the Technical Committee to Review the Interim Constitution of Southern Sudan. That group’s task has been to develop not only new constitutional terminology to reflect the birth of the Republic of South Sudan on July 9 but to draft a series of amendments to guide the set-up of the new republic’s executive and legislative branches, among other key issues.

Though moves to prepare a transitional constitution have drawn significant political opposition within South Sudan, though the legislative assembly approved the document on July 6 after nearly eight hours of deliberation.

USIP’s advisory work has focused on suggesting ways for the South Sudanese to build an open and effective process of constitutional transformation, in addition to providing advice on specific constitutional provisions, says Jason Gluck, USIP’s senior rule of law adviser and the director of its constitution-making program.

USIP’s efforts in South Sudan follow the publication last year of a path-breaking volume on the practical challenges of constitution-making in a variety of countries emerging from conflict or autocratic rule. In all, Framing the State in Times of Transition examined 19 cases, sifting through the complexities and options faced by those trying to ground their state-building on a democratic, constitutional foundation.

“This is very much a case of bringing together the ‘think’ and the ‘do’ of the Institute,” says Gluck. “We have the thought leadership in this area, and we have the opportunity to go to places like South Sudan and bring that learning to bear.” Gluck’s advisory work on South Sudan constitutional issues began last December, and he expects that it will continue with a focus on the drafting of an eventual, permanent constitution later this year—after the transitional document is formally in place.

In anticipation of that shift in South Sudan’s constitutional focus, Gluck, along with Susan Stigant of the National Democratic Institute, drafted a paper in March titled, “Roadmap to South Sudan’s Permanent Constitution: Goals, Principles and Options.” In it, they write:

“There is no single ‘best practice’ for constitution-making. The constitutional drafting process that will work best for South Sudan must be designed by South Sudanese based on the nation’s unique history, politics, society, resources, priorities and needs. While no two processes are identical, successful democratic constitutions do share a fundamental quality–they are deemed legitimate in the eyes of the citizenry.”

Acknowledging the political sensitivities raised by the constitution-making process, the paper suggests five guiding principles as the South Sudanese move forward:

  • Inclusivity: “Representatives of communities of interest are, wherever possible, given a seat at the table so that each has a hand in the negotiating and drafting of the document.”
  • Public Participation: “In recent constitution-making experiences, the people are guaranteed an opportunity to express their needs and aspirations in a forum that is conducive to democratic dialogue.”
  • Transparency: “The constitution-making process is conducted in an open and transparent manner so that people are not needlessly suspicious of hidden political agendas.”
  • Consensus: “Decisions are reached by drafting and negotiating bodies based on discussion, negotiation and persuasion, not by inflexible application of majority rules. Achieving consensus depends on having time to build relationships and gain mutual understanding.”
  • Ownership: South Africa and Kenya established their own process and developed the content of their own constitutions. While they drew on experience and expertise from other countries, the roadmap was defined, driven and led from within.”

Related Publications

The Latest @ USIP: Grassroots Efforts to Address Sudan’s Humanitarian Crisis

The Latest @ USIP: Grassroots Efforts to Address Sudan’s Humanitarian Crisis

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

By: Sara Pantuliano

More than half of Sudan’s population of 46 million is in need of humanitarian assistance -- and less than a quarter of them are actually receiving aid amid the country’s civil conflict. Sara Pantuliano, the chief executive for the Overseas Development Institute, discusses the current crisis in Sudan, why Sudan is important for global peace and how grassroots organizations in the country can help deliver aid to places that international organizations cannot reach.

Type: Blog

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

The Latest @ USIP: How to Address Sudan’s Humanitarian Crisis Amid War

The Latest @ USIP: How to Address Sudan’s Humanitarian Crisis Amid War

Wednesday, January 3, 2024

By: Patrick Youssef

Nearly nine months into Sudan’s civil conflict, the fighting has not only upended daily life across the country, but also disrupted Sudan’s already shaky economic and social services — leaving millions in need of dire humanitarian assistance. Patrick Youssef, regional director for Africa at the International Committee of the Red Cross, discusses how the conflict is affecting Sudan’s civilian population and why some sort of agreement between the warring sides is the only way to safely clear avenues for humanitarian intervention.

Type: Blog

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

Civil War Pushes Sudan to the Brink of Humanitarian Disaster

Civil War Pushes Sudan to the Brink of Humanitarian Disaster

Wednesday, November 22, 2023

By: Ashish Kumar Sen

Away from the headlines dominated by the wars in Gaza and Ukraine, a civil war between Sudan’s military and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) is pushing the country to the brink of a humanitarian catastrophe. As an allegedly genocidal RSF gains the upper hand, a U.N. official has warned that Sudan is “facing a convergence of a worsening humanitarian calamity and a catastrophic human rights crisis.”

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & PreventionHuman Rights

After Six Months of Civil War, What’s the State of Play in Sudan?

After Six Months of Civil War, What’s the State of Play in Sudan?

Thursday, October 19, 2023

By: Alex Rondos

What started as clashes in Khartoum this April between the Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) has devolved into a civil war. General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, who leads the SAF, and his former deputy, the RSF’s General Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, had worked together in toppling the Bashir regime in 2019 and orchestrating a military coup in 2021. But tensions over how the RSF would integrate into the SAF eventually led to fighting that has metastasized over the last six months. Caught in the crossfire are Sudanese civilians, who are experiencing a growing humanitarian crisis.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

View All Publications