Former U.S. national security adviser Stephen Hadley and other top USIP staff briefed Hill members about a trip they took to Afghanistan and Pakistan this fall.

Hadley, along with Andrew Wilder, USIP’s director of Afghanistan and Pakistan programs, and Moeed Yusuf, a South Asia adviser at USIP, met separately with about 10 House and Senate members from defense and international affairs committees in early November.

It was Hadley’s first trip to the Afghanistan-Pakistan region since joining USIP. The three returned in October. While there, they visited USIP offices in Afghanistan and Pakistan, consulted with American, Afghan and Pakistan government and military officials, and a wide array of business, civil society, think tank, and media representatives.

Hadley came away from Afghanistan with a distinct sense that the U.S. relationship with the country needs to endure for a long time. Peace will come only after a regional settlement, Hadley and others said at a press briefing at USIP. And the on-again, off-again relationship with the Afghan president is growing stronger, especially with Gen. John Allen, the top commander there, and Ryan Crocker, the U.S. ambassador, working well together.

“The re-set of the relationship with Karzai is well underway,” he said.

In fact, the re-set of the relationship with Pakistan, damaged in part by the U.S. targeting of Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad in May, is also on the mend.

“There may be disputes in the marriage, but divorce is not an option,” Hadley told the reporters.

Many in Washington, and in Islamabad, debate whether the U.S.-Pakistan relationship can be defined as transactional or strategic, a reflection of whether the U.S. is there for the long haul.

“We came away saying it’s both,” Hadley told reporters. “In terms of our investment economically and in terms of development assistance, that’s the strategic part. It should be relatively unconditioned other than the kind of transparency that is required in order to make the aid effective,” he said. “But in terms of security cooperation, counterterrorism, that probably is pretty transactional.”

Hadley, who was national security adviser for President George W. Bush, was hosted in Afghanistan at the Institute’s headquarters in Kabul. “I was overwhelmingly impressed with the potency and relevancy of USIP operations,” Hadley said afterward about his trip to “KBO,” the USIP permanent office in Kabul. “Small footprint, high impact; centers of excellence at the cutting edge of the intellectual discourse on war and peace in these two nations just the way USIP should be. The Institute’s programs are dealing with the key conflict-related issues confronting the United States in the two countries and are looked to within those countries for intellectual leadership on conflict-related issues by both influential officials within the government and key non-governmental thought leaders.”

Related Publications

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

Wednesday, February 21, 2024

By: Christopher Clary

At midnight on the night of February 24-25, 2021, India and Pakistan reinstated a cease-fire that covered their security forces operating “along the Line of Control (LOC) and all other sectors” in Kashmir, the disputed territory that has been at the center of the India-Pakistan conflict since 1947. While the third anniversary of that agreement is a notable landmark in the history of India-Pakistan cease-fires, the 2021 cease-fire is fragile and needs bolstering to be maintained.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

By: Asfandyar Mir, Ph.D.;  Tamanna Salikuddin

Days after Pakistan’s February 8 general election, the Election Commission of Pakistan released the official results confirming a major political upset. Contrary to what most political pundits and observers had predicted, independents aligned with former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) won the most seats at the national level, followed by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM). No party won an absolute majority needed to form a government on its own. The resultant uncertainty means the United States may have to contend with a government that is more focused on navigating internal politics and less so on addressing strategic challenges.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

Tamanna Salikuddin on Pakistan’s Elections

Tamanna Salikuddin on Pakistan’s Elections

Monday, February 12, 2024

By: Tamanna Salikuddin

Surprisingly, candidates aligned with former Prime Minister Imran Khan won the most seats in Pakistan’s elections. But while voters “have shown their faith in democracy,” the lack of a strong mandate for any specific leader or institution “doesn’t necessarily bode well for [Pakistan’s] stability,” says USIP’s Tamanna Salikuddin.

Type: Podcast

The 2021 India-Pakistan Ceasefire: Origins, Prospects, and Lessons Learned

The 2021 India-Pakistan Ceasefire: Origins, Prospects, and Lessons Learned

Tuesday, February 6, 2024

By: Christopher Clary

The February 2021 ceasefire between India and Pakistan along the Line of Control in Kashmir has—despite occasional violations—turned into one of the longest-lasting in the countries’ 75-year shared history. Yet, as Christopher Clary writes, the ceasefire remains vulnerable to shocks from terrorist attacks, changes in leadership, and shifting regional relations. With the ceasefire approaching its third anniversary, Clary’s report examines the factors that have allowed it to succeed, signs that it may be fraying, and steps that can be taken to sustain it.

Type: Special Report

Peace Processes

View All Publications