USIP's Jason Gluck looks at the debate taking place in Libya today between those who believe a federalist approach will be good for the country - and those who don't.

This month, thousands of Libyans in Tripoli and Benghazi took to the streets chanting “No, no to federalism,” and “Libya is one.” The demonstrations were in response to a statement earlier this month from the Benghazi-based Cyrenaica District Citizens Council, declaring Cyrenaica, which stretches from Sirte in the west to Libya’s eastern border with Egypt, a federal autonomous region. The statement was quickly repudiated by the Benghazi Local Council, but not before Libyan leader Mustapha Abdel Jalil accused some Arab states of supporting “sedition that is happening in the east,” and vowed to defend Libya’s national integrity “with force” if necessary. Subsequent demonstrations in Benghazi led to clashes between pro and anti-federalism opponents, where several people were wounded.

Just like that, Libyans found themselves in the all too common downward spiral of zero-sum federalism politics. Each side sees it vastly differently. The side that favors federalism fears that those opposed to federalism would continue the Qaddafi era’s marginalization of Benghazi and the east – home to the uprising. While those opposed to federalism accuse those who support it of wanting to divide and disintegrate the nation.

The tragic irony is that both views not only distort the other’s position, but make any chance of finding a system of governance that could satisfy both sides’ basic needs much more difficult. Federalism becomes an elusive and stigmatized concept, useful only for the purpose of politicized rhetoric, rather than the malleable form of governance that it actually is.

Federalism, at its most basic level, is a system of governance with at least two levels of government (federal and state, for example), each constitutionally allocated substantial legislative authorities and each primarily elected by its residents. Whatever this definition tells you about federal systems is far outweighed by what it does not. Most notably, by merely describing a state as “federal” almost nothing is known about how the state actually divides powers and resources between the different levels of government. There are highly centralized federations, such as the United States, India, Russia, and Malaysia, for example, as well as highly decentralized unitary states, like Indonesia, France, and the United Kingdom.

Favoritism of certain regions (and the corresponding marginalization of others) is common in dictatorial regimes. Libya under Qaddafi was no exception. In my conversations with residents of Benghazi, I heard numerous tales of easterners having to spend a week or more in Tripoli just to get a commercial license, while basic services that were planned and administered from the capital were described as inefficient and non-responsive to local needs and preferences. Still weary and mistrustful from years of neglect, it is not surprising that residents of Benghazi are now calling for greater authority over local affairs.

It is a positive sign that the National Transitional Council (NTC) leadership is responding. A law on decentralization is currently being considered by the NTC, which, according to Chairman Jalil, would give local councils “budgets and administrative competences to get rid of central rule, which caused Libyans so much suffering in the past.”

That the NTC recognizes the need for greater decentralization, and is willing to introduce it, makes the violence over federalism all the more unnecessary and troubling. Whether the ultimate modality for solving Libya’s governance problems is constitutional federalism or statutory decentralization is not unimportant. But it is certainly less important than resolving the underlying problems themselves. Forsaking politicized rhetoric is a crucial first step towards finding solutions. A second would be a technical examination of comparative governance models – how different countries distribute authorities between federal and sub-national government, how they manage natural resources and share revenue, the optimal number of sub-national units, and mechanisms for inter-governmental relations and dispute resolution, to name just a few issues that are highly variable but central to federalism and decentralization.

An examination of other countries’ experiences with federalism might also reveal that while some federations have eventually split apart, many nations have managed to remain united in large part because of political and governance solutions found in federalism.

Finally, having better framed the issues and identified a range of options, Libyans would be well served by engaging in local and inter-communal dialogues, where mutually acceptable solutions could be identified and discussed. Such dialogues could increase local understanding and support for mechanisms that might eventually be adopted by the forthcoming constitutional commission, and could reduce future demonstrations, recriminations, and the potential for violence in Libya.

Related Publications

How Commemoration Can Help Unite a Divided Libya

How Commemoration Can Help Unite a Divided Libya

Thursday, August 24, 2023

By: David Wood;  Mehdi Bchir

In the al-Washishi district of Benghazi a burnt-out car stands in memorial to a slain Libyan National Army (LNA) special forces fighter, serving as a city-wide reflection of the country’s 2014-2017 civil war. The car belonged to Salem (Afareet) Al-Naili, whose father was brutally murdered, one of the many victims of terrorist violence in the city. Inspired by the personal loss of his father, Salem threw himself into the fighting in the city’s civil war and was ultimately also assassinated.

Type: Analysis

Reconciliation

Citizen State and Community Relations in Building Local Governance

Citizen State and Community Relations in Building Local Governance

Monday, August 21, 2023

By: Andrew Cheatham;  Mohamed Fortia;  Nathaniel Wilson

Since the revolution in 2011 and the toppling of the long-standing regime of Muammar Gaddafi, Libya has experienced various degrees of political instability and conflict. A succession of internationally supported “transitions” have failed to bring the Libyan people a functioning state with a clear social contract based on a shared vision for the nation. This paper discusses the present challenges for good local governance as perceived by Libyan citizens and institutional actors. Through this lens, recommendations are offered for immediate, short-, and medium-term initiatives that can support the improvement of citizen relations with the three traditional arms of the state—the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.

Type: Discussion Paper

Democracy & Governance

Libya Can Move Past Its Political Deadlock, But It Will Take Work to Maintain A ‘Deal’

Libya Can Move Past Its Political Deadlock, But It Will Take Work to Maintain A ‘Deal’

Friday, May 19, 2023

By: Andrew Cheatham

Since 2012, multiple failed political transitions have taken their toll on the Libyan people. The continued and increasingly complex internal divisions and external vectors affecting Libya threaten to send it into another spiral of crisis and violence. Local and national leaders working in good faith to stabilize the country have inevitably grown cynical as ruling elites and their international partners fail to deliver local security and good governance.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & PreventionPeace Processes

Beyond Elections: Libya Needs Unified Institutions and Reconciliation

Beyond Elections: Libya Needs Unified Institutions and Reconciliation

Wednesday, April 26, 2023

By: Mehdi Bchir

Last week, the U.N. Security Council met to discuss its Libya mission and its new plan to end the country’s political impasse through elections. While credible polls will be a critical step in forging a path to peace, they are not a panacea for addressing this byzantine conflict’s deeply rooted drivers and the intense, bitter rivalries and factionalism that have surfaced since 2011. Indeed, previous efforts to hold elections have buckled under the weight of the intricate dynamics at play. Over a decade after the fall of Muammar Qaddafi, resolving Libya's complex conflict will require a multifaceted approach that prioritizes building trust among Libyans.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & PreventionDemocracy & Governance

View All Publications