On March 12, the U.S. Institute of Peace’s (USIP) Center for Conflict Management and the Harvard Kennedy School’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs co-convened a closed briefing on the Seoul Nuclear Security Summit for senior diplomats of countries whose head of state will be participating in the summit. Ambassadors, Deputy Chiefs of Mission, and Heads of Political Section from over 30 embassies participated in the briefing.

March 15, 2012

On March 12, the U.S. Institute of Peace’s (USIP) Center for Conflict Management and the Harvard Kennedy School’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs co-convened a closed briefing on the Seoul Nuclear Security Summit for senior diplomats of countries whose head of state will be participating in the summit. Ambassadors, Deputy Chiefs of Mission, and Heads of Political Section from over 30 embassies participated in the briefing. The summit will be the largest of its kind in the security field that focuses on international cooperative measures to protect nuclear materials and facilities from terrorist groups.

This closed briefing was the final activity of the USIP-initiated Seoul Nuclear Security Summit Study Group (SNS3G). Launched in fall 2010, SNS3G builds on the key findings of the USIP-facilitated Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States, which was directed by Paul Hughes. USIP placed early emphasis on the need for comprehensive preparations for the Seoul Nuclear Security Summit at the Institute’s 4th U.S.-South Korea-Japan Trilateral Dialogue in Northeast Asia Track 1.5 conference, which was convened in Seoul in January 2011. SNS3G’s key objective has been to work with U.S. and South Korean officials and technical experts to help ensure that the March 26-27 summit in Seoul leads to concrete progress in improving nuclear security. Speakers included Matthew Bunn (Harvard University), Michelle Cann (Partnership for Global Security), Kelsey Davenport (Arms Control Association), and Abiodun Williams (USIP). The experts highlighted the need for and specific ways to bolster nuclear security and prevent nuclear terrorism. John Park (USIP), who directs the Institute’s Korea Working Group, moderated the session.

During March 20-22, USIP’s Academy will be launching a new course titled “China's Nuclear Posture, North Korea's Nuclear Challenge, and U.S. National Security” that explores nuclear security and other nuclear-related issues in Northeast Asia. For more information regarding registration, click here.


Related Research & Analysis

The Risks of South Korea’s Nuclear Armament Under a Troubled Democracy

The Risks of South Korea’s Nuclear Armament Under a Troubled Democracy

Monday, February 10, 2025

On President Donald Trump’s first day in office, he referred to North Korea as a “nuclear power.” Just a few months before, North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un said he would “exponentially” increase his country’s nuclear weapons arsenal, which he followed by testing a new intercontinental ballistic missile and a new hypersonic missile. Additionally, there are concerns that Moscow may transfer sensitive military technologies to North Korea in exchange for Pyongyang supplying weaponry and troops for Russia’s war on Ukraine. These developments inject new urgency into a key question that will have major ramifications for stability and security on the Korean Peninsula and beyond: Should South Korea go nuclear?

Type: Analysis

Moving Forward on North Korea: The Case for Bold Transitional Justice Initiatives in South Korea

Moving Forward on North Korea: The Case for Bold Transitional Justice Initiatives in South Korea

Wednesday, December 18, 2024

Near- and medium-term prospects for the peaceful reunification of North and South Korea are poor, and steadily worsening. Nevertheless, this discussion paper argues that South Korea needs to prepare for a possible peaceful reunification of the Korean Peninsula. The paper proposes a five-step process to advance a bold transitional justice initiative in South Korea and ways that international actors can help. The paper concludes with recommendations to strengthen this transitional justice process.

Type: Discussion Paper

How Should Seoul Respond to North Korea's Soldiers in Russia?

How Should Seoul Respond to North Korea's Soldiers in Russia?

Wednesday, November 13, 2024

The Ukraine war is taking a new turn with the involvement of North Korean soldiers. Washington estimates that, so far, North Korea has sent approximately 10,000 troops to Russia — around 8,000 of whom have been deployed to the western region of Kursk, where Ukraine seized territory in a surprise attack earlier this year. And as U.S. officials predicted in late October, North Korean troops have reportedly begun engaging in direct combat.

Type: Analysis

North Korean Troops in Russia Show Putin Is Doubling Down on Ukraine War

North Korean Troops in Russia Show Putin Is Doubling Down on Ukraine War

Tuesday, October 29, 2024

After signing a mutual defense pledge in June, North Korea and Russia relations appear to be deepening. U.S. officials confirmed last week that North Korean troops, including elite special forces, were in Russia for training and potentially combat operations against Ukraine. This represents a “dangerous expansion of the war,” according to U.S. and NATO officials. It could also have serious ramifications for peace and security on the Korean Peninsula. South Korea is concerned that the deployment of North Korean troops could provide them valuable combat and technical experience. Meanwhile, China is watching closely to see what this means for its influence over North Korea and the implications for broader geopolitical tensions with the West.

Type: Question and Answer

View All Research & Analysis