My colleague Bill Byrd has just written a provocative but thoughtful piece on the limits of what large, international conferences can achieve for Afghanistan. Whatever the benefits are of keeping Afghanistan on the international agenda, Bill is rightly skeptical that these large conferences often confuse talk for action, and raise expectations that are invariably disappointed.

Mining in Afghanistan
Photo Credit: The New York Times/ Mauricio Lima

Now, what the International Crisis Group once called Afghanistan's "travelling Jamboree" is heading to Tokyo July 8 to discuss post-2014 civilian assistance to Afghanistan. The topic is important, especially since it has been totally overshadowed by the security transition. So the high-level attention will be welcome. But what can really be achieved?

The "international community," like any community, deserves an anthropology of its own. These meetings have their set rituals and hierarchies, and the most important bits of communication are often indirect: understood by the participants but difficult to perceive by outside observers. The communiqués that result are reliably unreadable. They almost always begin with the good intention of being punchy and sharp, with some takeaways for the press, and quickly slide back into diplomatic sludge. Every previous conference ever held must be mentioned in deference to all the previous hosts, every previous agreement made must be reached; every country's pet priority must be set down.

The ritual is set to repeat itself in Tokyo on Sunday. As usual, optimistic background documents have been prepared. Experts in fifty capitals around the world have written statements for their ministers that are variations on an eternal theme: "while much has been achieved, much remains to be done." The integrity of the "Afghan lead" will be highlighted, followed inevitably by a long list of what the Afghans "must do." "Mutual accountability" will be pledged. Again.

Nabakov once described politics as ‘the transformation of perfectly innocent little towns into the names of international treaties.’ And so it was with Afghan conferences on civilian assistance: Tokyo, Berlin, Paris, now Tokyo again.

In an era of perceived plenty, like that between 2001 and 2008, this conference ritual was comforting and easy to believe in. Donors pledged money in exchange for hearing pleasant words from the Afghan delegation about the need for good governance and the determination to tackle corruption. Plans to build railroads, invest in mines and develop the private sector were discussed. Donors "insisted" on a few "measurable benchmarks" of good governance and the Afghan government agreed to implement them. Inevitably, when the jamboree met again a year or two later, the money had not been fully pledged, the investments had not really been made, and the benchmarks had not been met. What hadn't changed was the willingness to believe in the ritual, and do it again. Nabakov once described politics as "the transformation of perfectly innocent little towns into the names of international treaties." And so it was with Afghan conferences on civilian assistance: Tokyo, Berlin, Paris, London, Kabul, now Tokyo again.

But the mood will surely be different at Tokyo II. The combination of global fiscal austerity and an ongoing frustration with the pace of progress in Afghanistan has to make the ritual a little more difficult to swallow. The Afghans must begin to understand that patience is running out, and money will run out with it. The real fact of scarce resources will make the conditionality of the international community much more credible.

In the end the ritualistic words spoken at the conferences don't matter. What is important is the dialog of deeds that takes place in the months afterwards through the meeting of respective commitments. Up to now, both sides have let each other down, and that essential dialog is permeated with distrust. Tokyo cannot restore that trust, but if post-Tokyo actions don't begin to soon, then it is difficult to foresee that the Afghan conference ritual will continue much longer.

Scott Smith is deputy director of USIP’s Afghanistan program. He is a former UN official and will be in Tokyo during the conference on Afghanistan. Look for more from Scott in coming days.

Related Publications

Moscow Concert Hall Attack Will Have Far-Reaching Impact

Moscow Concert Hall Attack Will Have Far-Reaching Impact

Wednesday, March 27, 2024

By: Mary Glantz, Ph.D.;  Gavin Helf, Ph.D.;  Asfandyar Mir, Ph.D.;  Andrew Watkins

On Friday, terrorists attacked the Crocus City Hall outside Moscow leaving 140 people dead and 80 others critically wounded. Soon after, the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the attack. The terrorist group, which is headquartered in Iraq and Syria, has several branches, including in South and Central Asia. Press reports suggest the U.S. government believes the Afghanistan-based affiliate of the Islamic State, ISIS-Khorasan (ISIS-K), was behind the attack. The Biden administration has publicly noted that it had warned the Russian government of the terrorism threat in early March in line with the procedure of “Duty to Warn.”

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

The Challenges Facing Afghans with Disabilities

The Challenges Facing Afghans with Disabilities

Thursday, February 29, 2024

By: Belquis Ahmadi

In Afghanistan, obtaining accurate data on the number of persons with disabilities — including gender-disaggregated information — has always been a challenging endeavor. But based on the data we do have, it’s clear that more than four decades of violent conflict have left a considerable portion of the Afghan population grappling with various forms of disabilities, both war-related and otherwise. And the pervasive lack of protective mechanisms, social awareness and empathy surrounding disability continue to pose formidable challenges for individuals with disabilities, with women being disproportionately affected.

Type: Analysis

GenderHuman Rights

What to Expect from the Doha Conference on Afghanistan

What to Expect from the Doha Conference on Afghanistan

Thursday, February 15, 2024

By: Kate Bateman;  Andrew Watkins

On February 18-19, United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres will convene a meeting on Afghanistan in Doha to discuss the ongoing humanitarian and human rights crises and the recent report on a way forward by U.N. Special Coordinator for Afghanistan Feridun Sinirlioğlu. Special envoys from U.N. member states and international organizations will attend; representatives from Afghan civil society, women’s groups and Taliban officials have also been invited. The conference is a critical, high-level opportunity for donors and the region to chart next steps on how to improve the situation in Afghanistan and engage with the Taliban regime.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

The Latest @ USIP: U.N. Engagement in Afghanistan

The Latest @ USIP: U.N. Engagement in Afghanistan

Wednesday, December 20, 2023

By: Kanni Wignaraja

While some parts of the Afghan economy managed to stabilize in 2023, poverty continued to increase and now stands at 69 percent of the population. Kanni Wignaraja, director for Asia and the Pacific at the U.N. Development Programme, discusses UNDP’s efforts to build resilience in local markets and promote women-owned enterprises in Afghanistan; explores ways to navigate relations with the Taliban; and examines how the decline in international aid is affecting humanitarian efforts in the country.

Type: Blog

EconomicsHuman Rights

View All Publications