Senior Program Officers Keith Bowen and Nina Sughrue, in conjunction with a local partner, recently conducted a training workshop in conflict resolution in Kabul for 34 Afghans from across the NGO spectrum. The objective was to synthesize traditional Afghan and USIP-based methods of conflict resolution.

Recent violence in Afghanistan highlights the deterioration of the country's security situation. Decades of war, local rivalries, economic instability, the persistent drug trade, lack of social investments, a porous border and other difficulties also contribute to destabilization and create openings for Taliban and al-Qaeda extremists.

To counter these trends, Afghan government and civil society actors have attempted to bring stakeholders together to address these issues. In an effort to buoy local peacebuilding initiatives, USIP Senior Program Officers Nina Sughrue and Keith Bowen, in conjunction with local partner the Welfare Association for the Development of Afghanistan (WADAN), conducted a two-pronged training workshop on conflict resolution in Kabul in April and July.

The programs included 34 Afghans from more than two dozen non-governmental organizations, including the Afghan Help and Training Program, the Afghan NGOs Coordination Bureau, the Afghan Women's Council and UNESCO.

During the April session, USIP trainers taught the Institute’s conflict resolution portfolio of conflict analysis, communication skills, conflict styles, negotiation, mediation, problem solving and training techniques through lecture and interactive role-playing exercises.

In preparation for the July workshop, the participants were required to complete USIP’s on-line conflict analysis course, which was recently translated into Dari and instructed to develop a training module on one of the workshop topics and adapt them for the local Afghan context.

During the July workshop, the participants presented their modules to each other—essentially training each other in a blend of USIP methodology and traditional Afghan conflict resolution mechanisms. USIP trainers provided feedback to the groups based on the content of their work, the level of participation of group members and their training techniques. All of the groups incorporated actual Afghan problems as examples to complement the USIP methodology.

Said Sughrue, “We were thoroughly impressed with the group, especially in the last training where it was evident that they had put in a tremendous amount of effort on their training modules—incorporating lectures role playing and group work. It is also important for us to see first-hand how USIP materials translate to traditional societies like Afghanistan. This type of training is important but only one part of a larger approach which includes the totality of the Institute’s work.”

Reflected Bowen, "We are benefitting from our experience in Iraq, where we've built an experienced cadre of conflict management facilitators. With our support, these facilitators are bringing groups together and solving problems in their communities. Already, several of the participants from these Afghan programs have applied what they've learned to help solve problems in their communities. "

USIP plans to incorporate these trainers in a pre-existing network of trainers in Afghanistan.

Related Publications

Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Final Report

Senior Study Group on Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan: Final Report

Tuesday, May 14, 2024

When announcing the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in April 2021, President Joe Biden identified counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan as an enduring and critical US national security interest. This priority became even more pronounced after the Taliban’s return to power in August 2021, the discovery of al-Qaeda’s leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in Kabul less than a year later, and the increasing threat of the Islamic State of Khorasan (ISIS-K) from Afghanistan. However, owing to the escalating pressures of strategic competition with China and Russia, counterterrorism has significantly dropped in importance in the policy agenda.

Type: Report

Violent Extremism

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Why Counterterrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan Still Matters

Thursday, May 9, 2024

From wars in Ukraine and the Middle East to rising tensions in the South China Sea, there is no shortage of crises to occupy the time and attention of U.S. policymakers. But three years after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, the threat of terrorism emanating from South Asia remains strong and policymakers need to be more vigilant. Indeed, at the end of March, an Afghanistan-based affiliate of ISIS launched a devastating attack outside of Moscow, killing over 140 people.

Type: Question and Answer

Global PolicyViolent Extremism

Despite Daunting Economic Headwinds, Afghan Private Sector Shows Signs of Life

Despite Daunting Economic Headwinds, Afghan Private Sector Shows Signs of Life

Thursday, May 2, 2024

Three years after the Taliban took control of Afghanistan, the country’s economy remains in a dismal state marked by depression-level price deflation, high unemployment and a collapse of GDP. Still, while the bad news for Afghans is well known, less visible are some green shoots in the country’s private sector that, if properly encouraged, could mitigate the situation. These range from small business activity to Taliban plans for major projects to the potential for an uptick in investment. Clearly nothing in those developments can stimulate a strong economic revival.

Type: Analysis

Economics

View All Publications