For almost a decade, the U.S. Institute of Peace and its Iraqi partners have supported ethnic and religious minority communities in Iraq as part of the Institute’s broader mission of helping the country strengthen communal and institutional resilience. Employing innovative approaches to peacebuilding, USIP seeks to empower minority groups including Christians, Faily Kurds, Kakayees, Sabean-Mandaeans, Shabaks, and Eyzidis (Yazidis) to solve inter-communal disputes, and to advocate at all levels of government for their rights, access to services, and security.


To do so, the Institute works directly with local civil society organizations and networks. In the post-ISIS era these groups are playing a vital role in creating conditions for the safe, voluntary and sustainable return of minority internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees to their communities in the Nineveh Plains, Sinjar (Shingal) and elsewhere in northern Iraq.

Before the rise of ISIS, Iraq’s minority groups were increasingly shut out of government decision-making both locally and in Baghdad. Their marginalization contributed significantly to the failure to protect predominantly minority areas, and ultimately helped ease the way for the extremists’ invasion, which uprooted their communities.

Today, the minorities of Iraq continue to experience physical insecurity, political exclusion and a lack of proper public services. Meanwhile, the threat posed by intercommunal tensions among minority groups has discouraged many displaced residents from returning to their homes and contributed to emigration from their ancestral towns and villages. These conditions hamper early recovery efforts and development of longer-term resilience.

Alliance of Iraqi Minorities

Alliance of Iraqi Minorities
USIP helped establish, and continues to support, the Alliance of Iraqi Minorities (AIM), a coalition of civil society organizations that provides a voice for minority groups. AIM was formed in 2011 and is comprised of 18 non-governmental organizations (NGOs) representing the Christian, Faily Kurd, Kakayee, Sabean-Mandaean, Shabak, and Eyzidi (Yazidi) communities, among others.

  • In 2012, AIM successfully pushed for a change in the national budget law that led to minority areas receiving a more equitable share of government funding. The following year, AIM worked to implement the new law by leading a participatory budgeting process in Nineveh, which resulted in construction of schools, clinics, roads, and water projects. While the ISIS calamity and subsequent displacement disrupted its efforts, AIM resumed its work by developing a toolkit on participatory budgeting that shows how civic participation can contribute to stabilization of liberated minority areas. Participatory budgeting provides minority communities with a chance to join in decisions on local resource allocation, and offers a productive outlet for engagement with local and provincial governments—a substantive alternative to violence and migration. AIM has broadened public exposure to the participatory budgeting toolkit through workshops in towns throughout northern Iraq. 
  • In 2012 and 2013, AIM contributed to changes in Iraqi textbooks and school curriculums to include information on minorities and passages from their holy books and literature. Today, AIM is working with education officials in Baghdad and Erbil on broader education reform efforts.
  • In 2013 and 2015, AIM sought amendments to the Law on Regulating Rights of Components in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Its recommendations to the region’s parliament included ensuring a role for minorities in formulating legislation and policy, guaranteeing their representation in the judiciary and strengthening implementation of the law itself.
  • The Alliance proved particularly important in relation to addressing the tragic effects of ISIS. During and after the extremist group’s attacks on minority communities in 2014, AIM helped document ISIS crimes against Eyzidi (Yazidi) women and advised Iraq’s parliament and the international community on minorities’ needs. AIM advocates for repa­rations for minority communities harmed by ISIS violence and works with government agencies to help revive devastated minority communities.
 
 

Outcome-Oriented Facilitated Dialogues

USIP also works with minority communities to initiate problem-solving dialogues and other activities in key Iraqi provinces, especially as they relate to displaced minority groups and Iraq’s delicate social fabric. As tensions arise between the country’s ethnic and religious groups in areas liberated from ISIS—including non-minority sectors—USIP encourages reconciliation and community building by identifying the barriers, challenges and opportunities for conflict resolution.

USIP has invested significantly in its strategic partner Sanad for Peacebuilding, an Iraqi peacebuilding organization, and the Network of Iraqi Facilitators (NIF), as well as AIM, through training and mentoring on facilitated dialogue. With technical support from USIP, these locally led programs focus on de-escalating conflict by forging agreements that address governance, security and economic grievances at the community, local, and national levels. USIP’s outcome-oriented dialogue processes have been implemented in Tikrit, Hawija, Mahmoudiyah and elsewhere across Iraq.

  • In the summer of 2018, USIP and Sanad began a dialogue process with tribal and community leaders, including both Sunni and Shia Turkmen, in Ayadiya, a town near the city of Tal Afar. In August, tribal and community leaders, representatives from the central government, and the local governments in Nineveh governorate and in Tal Afar district signed an agreement that facilitates the return of 40,000 IDPs and sets out peaceful coexistence principles.
  • In Nineveh province, USIP and AIM have worked on reconciliation between the Christian and Shabak communities in the town of Bartella since 2011. Significant tensions between them from 2011 to 2013 spurred a USIP-facilitated dialogue that in turn led to the formation of a Christian-Shabak committee of community leaders designed to foster peaceful coexistence. However, demographic changes and the rise of local armed groups following ISIS’s occupation strained relations, raising significant barriers to IDPs’ return. As a result, in 2017 USIP and Sanad began a continuing dialogue initiative— supported by AIM — to address intra-community tensions among Christians and Shabaks.

Research

To better identify the drivers of conflict and barriers to return, USIP has collaborated with AIM and local researchers to collect data on stabilization and conflict dynamics, exploring local perceptions and inter-group relations, specifically between Christians and Shabak in the Nineveh Plains. The research presents recommendations to various stakeholders and decision-makers on the best means to address group grievances in the area.

In 2016 and 2017, USIP produced, in partnership with the Middle East Research Institute five studies on the perceptions of reconciliation held by minority communities in Nineveh province including Christian, Eyzidi (Yazidi), Sabean-Mandaean, Shabak and Turkmen. These assessments, which provide insights into the causes of conflict and demands of these communities, have been shared with international and national stakeholders including the U.S. and Iraqi governments. The research contains recommendations for the communities and can help policymakers craft a strategy for greater minority inclusion in Iraq by shedding light on the sources of conflict and grievance.

Featured Publications

Sarhang Hamasaeed testifies before the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights and International Organizations

The ISIS Genocide Declaration: What Next?

Sarhang Hamasaeed, senior program officer for the Middle East programs at the U.S. Institute of Peace, testified before the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights and International Organizations.

Senator Joni Ernst

Event Highlight

Senator Joni Ernst to Discuss U.S. Policy Options in Post-ISIS Iraq

U.S. Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) joined the U.S. Institute of Peace to give remarks on U.S. policy options in Iraq in the post-ISIS era. She discussed the protection of religious minority groups and offered her perspective on Iranian influence in the country and region.

event panel

Event Highlight

Stabilizing Iraq: What Is the Future for Minorities?

USIP held an examination of the work required to protect and include minorities, and the roles that can be played by Iraq’s national government, the Kurdistan Regional Government, and the United States.

Latest Publications

Baghdad Is Ready for a New Chapter in U.S.-Iraq Relations

Baghdad Is Ready for a New Chapter in U.S.-Iraq Relations

Thursday, April 25, 2024

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani met last week with U.S. President Joe Biden at the White House as part of a weeklong visit aimed at strengthening bilateral relations. The visit occurred amid several historic anniversaries and dangerous developments in the Middle East. April marks the 21st anniversary of the toppling of Saddam Hussein. Since 2003, the U.S.-Iraq relationship has witnessed many ups and downs. Even as tensions persist, particularly in relation to the U.S. troop presence in the country, al-Sudani’s visit — which featured the largest delegation Iraqis have brought to Washington — demonstrates Iraqi will to start a new chapter in the strategic partnership that goes beyond security.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & GovernanceGlobal Policy

Ukraine’s New U.S. Lifeline: Why It’s Vital and What’s Next

Ukraine’s New U.S. Lifeline: Why It’s Vital and What’s Next

Thursday, April 25, 2024

This week’s U.S. approval of nearly $61 billion in funds for Ukraine’s defense is a lifeline in the Ukrainians’ struggle against Russia’s unprovoked invasion and the assault on peace and rule of law in Europe and beyond. Ukrainian troops have been rationing ammunition, their lack of defensive missiles has exposed Ukrainian cities to Russian aerial attacks — and many military analysts predicted a probable collapse on part of Ukraine’s eastern defensive lines. While this U.S. action boosts Ukrainians’ capacities and morale, ending this war will need further funds, forces and security measures for those fighting and suffering for their survival — and for the redemption of international peace through rule of law.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Sometimes the Good Guys Win: Five Lessons from Guatemala’s 2023 Election

Sometimes the Good Guys Win: Five Lessons from Guatemala’s 2023 Election

Thursday, April 25, 2024

When Bernardo Arévalo won the presidency last year, it left Guatemala’s corrupt old guard reeling. Arévalo and his anti-corruption Semilla Movement posed a direct threat to the power of Guatemala’s “pacto de los corruptos” — an alliance of government officials, politicians, prosecutors, judges, party financiers, state contractors and some wealthy families. The pact mobilized to overturn the election results. But Guatemala’s civil society, backed by U.S. and broader international support, was able to uphold the elections and advance democracy in the Central American nation.

Type: Analysis

Democracy & GovernanceGlobal Elections & Conflict

A Rising Philippines Faces a Crucial Year Ahead

A Rising Philippines Faces a Crucial Year Ahead

Wednesday, April 24, 2024

By virtue of its geography alone, the Philippines is arguably Southeast Asia’s most strategically important country. Yet its actual influence has tended to lag its potential due to decades of socioeconomic struggle and internal instability, especially in its restive southern island of Mindanao. In recent years, however, the Philippines has rapidly emerged as one of the most consequential countries in the Indo-Pacific, driven in large part by President Ferdinand Marcos’ transformative policies on national security, defense and foreign relations.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

China's Vision for Global Security: Implications for Southeast Asia

China's Vision for Global Security: Implications for Southeast Asia

Wednesday, April 24, 2024

China’s Global Security Initiative (GSI) marks a new phase in Beijing’s ongoing push to change the international security order. Through the GSI, China seeks to establish itself as a counterbalance to U.S. influence and to reshape security management in a number of strategically important regions. The GSI is still in the early stages of implementation, but it has already demonstrated the potential to disrupt the existing security framework in Southeast Asia. This may lead to increased polarization within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), with some member states aligning with the GSI and others remaining cautious due to their stronger affiliations with the United States.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

View All Publications