The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) working group sought to increase understanding of R2P and identify concrete steps to bolster the political will of U.S. decision-makers to respond in a timely manner to threats of genocide, crimes against humanity and other mass atrocities in this emerging national norm. This project became inactive on July 23, 2013. The text below is for archival purposes. 

group

About the Working Group

The Working Group on the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) is a joint effort by the United States Institute of Peace, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, and the Brookings Institution. Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and former Presidential Special Envoy to Sudan Richard Williamson co-chair the working group, which includes former U.S. government officials, academics, foreign policy experts, political consultants and media professionals. The Working Group aims to:

  1. Enhance understanding of the barriers to the prevention of genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity
  2. Assess how R2P has worked in practice in relevant cases
  3. Identify concrete steps to bolster the political will of U.S. decision-makers to respond in a timely manner to threats of mass atrocities

The Report of the Working Group was released in July 2013.

The Responsibility to Protect in Brief

The Responsibility to Protect, or R2P, emerged as a political response to an urgent need, as the international community struggled to formulate an adequate response to the conscience-shocking atrocities committed in Rwanda, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Sudan, events that turned the end of the 20st Century into one of the bloodiest episodes in modern history. Heads of State and Government affirmed the R2P principle in the 2005 World Summit Outcome Document, which articulated R2P as having three core pillars:

  • Each individual State has the responsibility to protect its populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.
  • The international community should, as appropriate, encourage and help States to exercise this responsibility and support the United Nations in establishing an early warning capability.
  • The international community should take collective action, in a timely and decisive manner, through the Security Council, in accordance with the Charter, including Chapter VII, on a case-by-case basis and in cooperation with relevant regional organizations as appropriate, should peaceful means be inadequate and national authorities are manifestly failing to protect their populations.

Under the R2P principle each state has a primary responsibility to protect its population, by ensuring the rights of minorities, addressing institutionalized discrimination, or ratifying international human rights treaties. If the regime is unable or unwilling to fulfill these duties, it no longer operates as a legitimate sovereign, leading to a transfer of responsibilities to the international community to counter acute risks of brutal violence against civilians. The Responsibility to Protect is not a tool, but a guiding principle requiring the consideration of available measures to address the risk of atrocities, in particular preventive diplomatic, legal, and economic measures, as well as reactive instruments short of military action. The use of coercive military force remains a last resort option in case the crimes committed go beyond the pale and there are reasonable grounds to believe non-military and non-coercive options would fail.

Members

Co-Chairs

  • Madeleine K. Albright, Former Secretary of State and chair of the Albright Stonebridge Group
  • The late Richard S. Williamson, Former Presidential Special Envoy to Sudan and Non-Resident Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution

Participants

  • David Abramowitz, Vice President of Policy and Government Relations, Humanity United
  • Michael Abramowitz, Director, Center for the Prevention of Genocide, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
  • Simon Adams, Executive Director, Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect
  • Lloyd Axworthy, President and Vice-Chancellor, University of Winnipeg
  • Anna Burger, Advanced Leadership Initiative Fellow, Harvard University
  • Louis Caldera, President, Caldera Associates, LLC
  • Ron Capps, Writer and Analyst
  • Wesley K. Clark, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Wesley K. Clark & Associates
  • Gregory Craig, Partner, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP
  • Paula J. Dobriansky, Senior Fellow, Harvard University, JFK Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
  • Eric Edelman, Distinguished Fellow, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments
  • Gareth Evans, President Emeritus, International Crisis Group/ Chancellor, Australian National University
  • Michelle Farley, Program Officer, Formerly of Wellspring Advisors
  • Elizabeth Ferris, Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution
  • Jerry Fowler, Senior Policy Analyst, Open Society Foundations
  • Sherri Goodman, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, CAN
  • Heather Hurlburt, Executive Director, National Security Network
  • Bruce Jentleson, Professor of Public Policy and Political Science, Duke University
  • Jim Kolbe, Senior Transatlantic Fellow, German Marshall Fund
  • Juan Méndez, Visiting Professor of Law, American University Washington College of Law
  • Martha Minow, Dean and Jeremiah Smith, Jr. Professor of Law, Harvard Law School
  • George Moose, Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, United States Institute of Peace
  • James O’Brien, Principal, Albright Stonebridge Group
  • Amir Osman, Africa Regional Manager, Open Society Foundations
  • Nicholas Rostow, Senior Director, Center for Strategic Research, National Defense University
  • Anne-Marie Slaughter, Bert G. Kerstetter ’66 University Professor of Politics and Inter­national Affairs, Princeton University
  • Nancy Soderberg, President, Connect U.S. Fund
  • Margot Wallström, Former Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Sexual Violence in Conflict, United Nations
  • Vin Weber, Partner, Mercury/Clark & Weinstock
  • Abiodun Williams, President, The Hague Institute for Global Justice
  • Lawrence Woocher, Formerly with Science Applications International Corporation
  • Anne C. Richard was a member of the group until she resigned in March 2012 from the International Rescue Committee to become assistant secretary for population, refu­gees, and migration, U.S. Department of State

Latest Publications

A Rising Philippines Faces a Crucial Year Ahead

A Rising Philippines Faces a Crucial Year Ahead

Wednesday, April 24, 2024

By virtue of its geography alone, the Philippines is arguably Southeast Asia’s most strategically important country. Yet its actual influence has tended to lag its potential due to decades of socioeconomic struggle and internal instability, especially in its restive southern island of Mindanao. In recent years, however, the Philippines has rapidly emerged as one of the most consequential countries in the Indo-Pacific, driven in large part by President Ferdinand Marcos’ transformative policies on national security, defense and foreign relations.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

China's Vision for Global Security: Implications for Southeast Asia

China's Vision for Global Security: Implications for Southeast Asia

Wednesday, April 24, 2024

China’s Global Security Initiative (GSI) marks a new phase in Beijing’s ongoing push to change the international security order. Through the GSI, China seeks to establish itself as a counterbalance to U.S. influence and to reshape security management in a number of strategically important regions. The GSI is still in the early stages of implementation, but it has already demonstrated the potential to disrupt the existing security framework in Southeast Asia. This may lead to increased polarization within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), with some member states aligning with the GSI and others remaining cautious due to their stronger affiliations with the United States.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Amid a Changing Global Order, NATO Looks East

Amid a Changing Global Order, NATO Looks East

Tuesday, April 23, 2024

As NATO celebrates its 75th anniversary this year, the Euro-Atlantic security alliance continues to deepen its engagement with Australia, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand, collectively known as the IP4. NATO has collaborated with these countries since the early 2000s, but Russia’s war against Ukraine, security challenges posed by China and renewed strategic competition have led to increased engagement. As the war in Ukraine grinds on and U.S.-China competition shows no sign of abating, the United States has much to gain from collaboration between its allies and partners in the Euro-Atlantic and Indo-Pacific.

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

Mental Health and Violent Conflict: A Vicious Cycle

Mental Health and Violent Conflict: A Vicious Cycle

Tuesday, April 23, 2024

When we think about the damage wrought by war, we often think about the physical consequences such as injuries and destroyed infrastructure. However, the often-invisible mental scars left behind by war are no less important.

Type: Analysis

Human Rights

Mirna Galic on NATO’s Long-standing Engagement in the Indo-Pacific

Mirna Galic on NATO’s Long-standing Engagement in the Indo-Pacific

Tuesday, April 23, 2024

Contrary to China’s assertions, NATO has a long history of engagement with the Indo-Pacific. But the alliance’s deep partnerships in the region have taken on renewed importance in recent years amid Russia’s war on Ukraine and renewed strategic competition between the U.S. and China, says USIP’s Mirna Galic.

Type: Podcast

View All Publications