Arab-Israeli Relations

Featured
An Education Track for the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process
September 2009 | Peace Briefing by Barbara Zasloff, Adina Shapiro, and A. Heather Coyne
Education plays a critical role in preparing communities for change and has made important contributions to post-conflict reconciliation in numerous war-torn societies, yet education issues have largely been excluded from past efforts to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. A new USIP report argues why an education track should be included in the negotiations phase and in the text of an agreement itself, and puts forward practical recommendations on how Israelis and Palestinians – and the international community – can move forward with a successful peace process that incorporates education.
Hamas: Ideological Rigidity and Political Flexibility
June 2009 | Special Report | Paul Scham and Osama Abu-Irshaid
A new USIPeace Briefing examines how the parties and international mediators can create an education track for the peace process that would create opportunities for more effective mediation and increase the chances for success of the process overall. The report recommends ways third party mediators can assist Israelis and Palestinians by addressing education in the peace agreement itself; building a role in the respective ministries to address the effects of the continuing violent conflict; and developing mechanisms in which frustrations arising from implementing a peace agreement itself can be discussed and facilitated within the network of schools. Authors Barbara Zasloff, Adina Shapiro, and USIP’s A. Heather Coyne argue how teachers and schools can play vital roles in defusing tensions and helping the youth understand their evolving environment and find places for themselves within it. Positioned to change attitudes and teach new skills, schools have exceptional outreach to all levels of society, the authors conclude.
Reconstructing Gaza – Lessons from Lebanon
March 2009 | USIPeace Briefing | Alistair Harris
As the international community continues to debate humanitarian assistance to Gaza, USIP examines "Reconstructing Gaza – Lessons from Lebanon" by Beirut-based Alistair Harris, a Deployable Civilian Expert for the British Government’s Stabilisation Unit. Harris argues that donors should avoid the temptation to adopt a mechanistic, one size fits all solution. "In the rush to rebuild what was destroyed, it should be remembered," writes Harris, "that the major catalysts for this conflict were political and economic. As such, the reconstruction effort must ensure that viable employment initiatives form part of the post-conflict stabilization plan. This was very much a man-made humanitarian disaster," concludes the report. "If the underlying issues are not addressed, unfortunately renewed conflict would seem inevitable."
March 2009 | Special Report | Frederic C. Hof
Although the Palestinian-Israeli “track” of the Arab-Israeli dispute remains at the heart of the conflict between Israel and its neighbors, the very complexity of that track (Jerusalem, refugees, borders, etc.) has led some to consider the Israeli-Syrian track to be relatively simple and straightforward. While simple it is not and straightforward it is only in relative terms, the Syrian-Israeli conflict can indeed be settled without prejudice to the central act of the Arab-Israeli drama.
Arab-Israeli relations have deteriorated to their lowest point in a generation, with intensifying and widening violence. However, the severity of the problems may drive the parties to reconsider long-stagnant issues and create opportunities for new efforts to resolve the conflict. In order to seize on the prospects for renewing negotiations, USIP is conducting both policy-relevant analysis and innovative programming in support of local initiatives to build support for peace.
Since 2000, USIP has published one dozen books and reports on Arab-Israeli relations and the role of the United States, provided about 70 grants totaling over $2.5 million to scholars and NGOs addressing various aspects of the conflict, and supported the work of more than 20 resident scholars and fellows on this subject.
The Institute seeks to present a balanced approach to its work relating to Arab-Israeli relations by supporting research, programs and grants that improve understanding, develop capacity and analyze the issues in ways that can be useful to all parties who are seeking peace.
USIP’s objectives in the region include:
- Educating the policy community on the role that the U.S. and the international community can have in influencing the Arab-Israeli conflict and on how to apply leverage to advance a peace process.
- Assessing the dynamics of the conflict and how political groups and key civil society actors, including Islamic movements, and how they affect efforts to initiate and sustain a peace process.
- Promoting understanding of "the other" and of techniques for managing conflict with "the other" through media, training, and the development of effective teaching tools for the classroom and the community. ("The other" is defined as an individual or group who has an identity, culture or beliefs that are different from one's own. We often generalize about others or dehumanize them without regard for individual differences.)
- Cultivating relationships within and between key sectors of Arab and Israeli society in a manner that creates an atmosphere supportive of improved relations and peaceful resolution of conflict.
- Understanding the religious dimensions of the conflict, particularly religion’s role as a mobilizing force in the politics of the region, and empowering key actors, such as religious leaders and local NGOs, to use religion as an instrument of peacemaking.
The Arab-Israeli Relations program draws upon the collective resources and integrated efforts of USIP's research, education, grant-making, fellowships, and professional training programs as well as its Centers of Innovation. The program is a part of USIP's Center for Mediation and Conflict Resolution directed by David Smock.
Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
USIP has undertaken a major analytical study of Arab-Israeli peace negotiations since 1991, focusing on U.S. peacemaking strategies and initiatives. Its results are published in a book entitled Negotiating Arab-Israeli Peace: American Leadership in the Middle East, authored by Ambassador Daniel C. Kurtzer and Scott B. Lasensky. |
|

