Twitter Chat on Libya’s Turmoil draws in U.S., U.K. Ambassadors

American and British ambassadors joined Libyan activists and analysts for a USIP Twitter chat this week, as rival lawmakers in Libya met for negotiations brokered by the United Nations to end the recent surge of violence and the political crises that sparked it.

20141001_TOB_USIPLibya_Chat.png
Participants in the #USIPLibya chat at the U.S. Institute of Peace. From left: Christina Murtaugh, Khitam Al-Khaykanee, Ferdaouis Bagga, Fiona Mangan.

Three years after rebel groups toppled the regime of Muammar Qaddafi, Libya remains trapped in cycles of violence and instability. Militias are battling in both Tripoli and Benghazi for control of the vast nation and Islamist groups like Ansar al-Sharia are a growing presence. Two opposing parliaments have emerged, one operating in Tobruk and the other in Tripoli. 

Amid these divisions, Libya’s regular police, army and judicial system have atrophied, exacerbating the security problem and undermining citizens’ trust in state institutions. USIP organized the Twitter chat to look at how Libya might escape this dangerous cycle. The conversation marked the release of new research on Libya’s security and justice landscape. The research findings were discussed in detail at a September 30 event at USIP headquarters.

The chat brought together a diverse range of participants, including the American, British, and Canadian emissaries to Libya, journalists, and Libyan civil society activists, as well as USIP experts.

The open discussion centered on five key questions posed by @USIP, which started off by asking how Libya could re-shape the security system.

Michael Aron, the British ambassador to Libya, tweeted the first response:

Others also stressed the need to overcome Libya’s polarized environment and reconcile competing parties.

The conversation then turned to Libya’s justice institutions and what they might do, in light of little to no security, to regain the confidence of Libyans. Participants in the chat called for more judicial reform, transparency and prosecution of human rights abuses committed by all factions. But they noted the difficulty of taking these steps without protection from functioning security units.

So, what could the international community do to support Libyan civil society. American Ambassador Deborah K. Jones, called for more training:

Independent analyst James Wheeler, however, said that providing security would be the best way to help civil society organizations.

USIP also asked how the deadlock among Libya’s political leaders and other elites might be broken. ForeignPolicy.com blogger Mohamed Eljarh had a multi-part answer:

The final question pondered how Libya’s militias might be reined in. Canadian Chargé d'Affaires Colin Townson advocated a political process:

Read the entire conversation on Storify.​


PHOTO: 20141001_TOB_USIPLibya_Chat.png

The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s).

PUBLICATION TYPE: Analysis