20121022-LEBANON_SYRIA_BATTLE_4-TOB.jpg
Photo Credit: The New York Times/ Moises Saman

When a car bomb exploded Friday morning in Beirut, the sadly all-too-familiar sights, sounds and smells, for so many Lebanese, preyed viciously and viscerally on the country’s worst fears.  For nearly 18 months, the phrase “Syrian spillover” has been bandied around by Lebanon watchers.  In the early days of the uprising in Syria, while some marveled at how Lebanon had seemed to avoid entanglement in the unfolding civil war across its border, most assumed such immunity could not last.  Then came fighting in Tripoli between pro- and anti-Syrian partisans and the much-feared specter of renewed sectarian violence in the country reared its head.  As refugee flows from Syria continued (and continue) to mount, and the Lebanese government and people worked hard to absorb the growing number fleeing from the terrors of the civil war now raging across their border, concern among Lebanese turned to management of the humanitarian crisis, as well as to the security implications for their country. 

In Lebanon, thoughts and memories of the country’s own 15-year long civil war (1975-1990) are omnipresent, so an exploding car in the middle of a busy Beirut street was enough to provoke an ominous sentiment of déjà-vu, even absent answers to the whos, whats, and whys of the incident.  When by day’s end the target was ascertained to have been the fatally-wounded Brigadier-General Wissam al-Hassan, head of the Information Branch of the Internal Security Forces, and a Sunni Muslim who was among the staunchest anti-Assad voices in the Lebanese intelligence establishment, the fears of “more to come” took hold.

Al-Hassan was aligned with the March 14 coalition, which was the key driver in ridding Lebanon of formal Syrian influence, and led investigations into the 2005 assassination of Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, for whom he had been a chief of security.  He was also an active cooperator with the United Nations Special Tribunal that investigated Hariri’s killing and which asserted that high-level Syrian officials may have been involved. 

More recently, al-Hassan arrested Michel Samaha, a former Lebanese minister of information alleging that he had smuggled weapons across the border into Lebanon from Syria, intending to foment violence and chaos. Two Syrian officers were indicted for the same plot. 

So while both the Syrian government and its ally in Lebanon, Hezbollah, denounced this morning’s bombing, the sentiment rings hollow for many, both within and outside the country. who detect a clear message from the regime clinging to power in Damascus, and sense a deep feeling of foreboding that  “Syrian spillover” had reached a whole new level. 

For more, read USIP’s Prevention newsletter.

Related Publications

Will the Israel-Hamas War Spiral into a Wider Conflict?

Will the Israel-Hamas War Spiral into a Wider Conflict?

Thursday, October 26, 2023

By: Mona Yacoubian

With the Israel-Hamas war poised to enter its fourth week, the conflict continues to escalate. The Israeli military announced on October 25 it had struck more than 7,000 targets inside Gaza, ranking the current military campaign among the most intense globally in recent memory. The conflict has resulted in an estimated 1,400 Israelis killed, according to Israeli government sources and more than 6,500 Gazans killed, according to the Hamas-controlled Health Ministry. More than 200 hostages are held captive in Gaza.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

How a Gaza Marine Deal Could Benefit Palestinians, Israelis and the Region

How a Gaza Marine Deal Could Benefit Palestinians, Israelis and the Region

Thursday, August 3, 2023

By: Ambassador Hesham Youssef

Amid today’s dismal Israeli-Palestinian context, positive developments have been in short supply. However, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s June announcement of preliminary approval for the development of the Gaza Marine gas fields provided a rare glimpse of a potential win-win opportunity. For the Palestinians, it could provide a much-needed boost to their lagging economy and the cash-strapped Palestinian Authority (PA). On the Israeli side, it allows the Netanyahu government to claim it is assisting in improving living conditions in Gaza and could lead to less U.S. pressure on issues like settlement expansion. In the big picture, this is another example of how energy is increasingly becoming a focus for potential win-win agreements in the East Mediterranean.

Type: Analysis

Economics

Could the Israel-Lebanon Maritime Border Deal be a Game-Changer?

Could the Israel-Lebanon Maritime Border Deal be a Game-Changer?

Thursday, October 13, 2022

By: Robert Barron;  Mona Yacoubian;  Ambassador Hesham Youssef

Israel, Lebanon and the United States announced this week that a deal has been reached between Israel and Lebanon on each country’s maritime border. Negotiations between the parties over the 330-square-miles of the Mediterranean Sea have proceeded with stops and starts since 2020, but over the past few months edged toward a mutually acceptable outcome. Under the agreement, the contested waters will be divided by a line straddling the “Qana” natural gas field. Both parties would be able to produce gas on their side of the line, in addition to royalty arrangements agreed upon. A buoy line will remain between the two countries.

Type: Analysis

EconomicsPeace Processes

View All Publications