The recently launched initiative, Alliance in Support of the Afghan People (ASAP), a bipartisan coalition dedicated to preserving and protecting the gains made in Afghanistan since 2001, is timely and welcome.

gate to Afghanistan health care clinic

I share the views of ASAP, but that’s largely because I have been working on Afghanistan for 20 years and have a deep affection for that difficult and troubled country. I also understand why many Americans without that experience have doubts about the usefulness of our continued commitment to Afghanistan.

To me, one of the things that is most important about ASAP’s initiative is that it takes seriously the idea that more and more Americans need to be convinced that Afghanistan should not be abandoned, that coherent arguments must be made, and that such concerns must be taken seriously.

For most of the past decade, it was sufficient for public officials to remind Americans in their moments of doubt about the Afghan adventure that Afghanistan had sheltered al-Qaida, and the plans for 9/11 had been hatched in the Afghan mountains. But with the killing of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden more than two years ago as well as the emergence of threats from newly disordered parts of the world and the growing frustration with both corruption and ingratitude from Afghans whom we strived to help, Americans cannot be blamed for increasingly questioning our continued engagement in that distant country.

The national security argument might have been the only one capable of justifying to the American people the massive expenditure of resources and effort we have seen over the past dozen years, and the loss of almost 1,800 U.S. military fighters to hostile action. The drawback was that the national security element made many Afghans believe that Afghanistan was indispensable to U.S. interests, and that corrupt and predatory behavior would have no consequences as long as the American presence was tolerated. That seemed true for a while.

Now, the U.S.’s over-arching security objectives have been achieved: Afghanistan is unlikely to be the source of danger to the U.S., at least for a while.

But the Taliban continue to be a formidable threat to many Afghans and to their and the region’s fledgling government and economy. Furthermore, the commitments we have made, the value of our own prestige, and the benefits of a strategic relationship with Afghanistan ought to be enough of an argument to remain engaged with that country, albeit with fewer resource commitments.

There is no doubt that Afghanistan’s leaders haven’t made it easy to help. But President Hamid Karzai’s public statements of criticism should not be mistaken for the more quietly voiced appreciation of many Afghans for America’s efforts. The insurgency’s continued ability to function in parts of Afghanistan should not be confused with a widespread desire among Afghans to see the Taliban return to power. And our own sense of indignation at not being sufficiently appreciated should not allow us to hide from the mistakes we ourselves have made that have cost us so much goodwill among the Afghan people.

The new Alliance In Support of the Afghan People has rightly attracted marquee names as signatories, including the likes of former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, former National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley (who is on the USIP board but signed onto ASAP in his personal capacity), former NATO Commander Admiral James Stavridis, former U.S. Ambassador to Iraq and Afghanistan Ryan Crocker, ex-White House Chief of Staff John Podesta, and feminist leader Gloria Steinem.

It is true that a reckless withdrawal from Afghanistan will put in jeopardy much of what has been achieved and could turn the country into a haven for extremists again. But it is more true that what has been achieved deserves to be preserved, not only for the sake of our security but for the sake of the many Afghans who  believed our promises, fought alongside us, took risks to promote values we have in common, and suffered from the inadequacies of their own government which we have supported.

These Afghans will outlast the current government, and our relationship with them should as well.

Scott Smith is USIP’s director of Afghanistan and Central Asia programs and previously served as a senior special assistant to the United Nations Secretary General’s Special Representative to Afghanistan in Kabul. He is editor, with Moeed Yusuf and Colin Cookman, of the forthcoming book Getting It Right in Afghanistan (December 2013, United States Institute of Peace Press).

Related Publications

The Latest @ USIP: Reclaiming Human Rights in Afghanistan

The Latest @ USIP: Reclaiming Human Rights in Afghanistan

Wednesday, April 17, 2024

Since taking power in 2021, the Taliban have imposed their own interpretation of Islamic law onto the people of Afghanistan and consistently rolled back human rights protections — especially for women and girls — all while the country struggles to recover from decades of conflict and economic crisis. USIP spoke with Fatima Gailani, the former president of the Afghan Red Crescent Society, about the various ways Afghans can put pressure on the Taliban to reclaim their rights and demand a better future.

Type: Blog

GenderHuman Rights

Asfandyar Mir on Why ISIS-K Attacked Moscow

Asfandyar Mir on Why ISIS-K Attacked Moscow

Monday, April 1, 2024

ISIS-K’s recent attack on the Russian capital was, in part, intended to assert the organization’s growing capacity to inflict terror beyond its home base of Afghanistan. “By reaching Moscow, ISIS-K is trying to signal it has the geographic reach to hit anywhere in the world,” says USIP’s Asfandyar Mir.

Type: Podcast

Moscow Concert Hall Attack Will Have Far-Reaching Impact

Moscow Concert Hall Attack Will Have Far-Reaching Impact

Wednesday, March 27, 2024

On Friday, terrorists attacked the Crocus City Hall outside Moscow leaving 140 people dead and 80 others critically wounded. Soon after, the Islamic State claimed responsibility for the attack. The terrorist group, which is headquartered in Iraq and Syria, has several branches, including in South and Central Asia. Press reports suggest the U.S. government believes the Afghanistan-based affiliate of the Islamic State, ISIS-Khorasan (ISIS-K), was behind the attack. The Biden administration has publicly noted that it had warned the Russian government of the terrorism threat in early March in line with the procedure of “Duty to Warn.”

Type: Question and Answer

Global Policy

The Challenges Facing Afghans with Disabilities

The Challenges Facing Afghans with Disabilities

Thursday, February 29, 2024

In Afghanistan, obtaining accurate data on the number of persons with disabilities — including gender-disaggregated information — has always been a challenging endeavor. But based on the data we do have, it’s clear that more than four decades of violent conflict have left a considerable portion of the Afghan population grappling with various forms of disabilities, both war-related and otherwise. And the pervasive lack of protective mechanisms, social awareness and empathy surrounding disability continue to pose formidable challenges for individuals with disabilities, with women being disproportionately affected.

Type: Analysis

GenderHuman Rights

View All Publications