This event is being organized by USIP in coordination with the State Department’s Office of the Coordinator for Reconstruction and Stabilization (S/CRS) and USAID’s Office of Conflict Management and Mitigation (CMM), as a forum of experts, policy and program shapers to engage in broader discussions about evolving dynamics in Kyrgyzstan, and possible areas for the international community to constructively engage to prevent further violence and safeguard a peaceful transition.

Humanitarian groups estimate that the recent crisis in southern Kyrgyzstan has resulted in a death toll that is likely to exceed the current count of 200, and forced over 400,000 refugees to flee from mounting ethnic violence. As a result of the overthrow of President Kurmanbek Bakiyev in April 2010 and the creation of a transitional government, the economically and politically stressed state appeared ripe for conflict. This tension erupted in early June with rioting and mob violence targeted at ethnic Uzbeks, and the turmoil marked a renewal of latent animosities between Kyrgyzstan’s two dominant ethnic groups. Even as the violence has begun to subside, the death toll continues to rise amid alarming accusations of the Kyrgyz government’s involvement in the tragedies.
 
Although Central Asian security has historically remained on the periphery of U.S. foreign policy, the ethnic violence in Kyrgyzstan has forced U.S. officials to acknowledge the dangers of conflict in the region. But, while humanitarian groups have been quick to call for action, there has been little substantive response from the major governments involved in the region. With Kyrgyzstan’s strategic importance as the only country in the world to house Russian and U.S. military bases, many are wondering when, how, or if the U.S. will intervene. Calls for a joint venture between the U.S. and Russia abound, while the security of the entire region appears to be hanging in the balance.

This event is being organized by USIP in coordination with the State Department’s Office of the Coordinator for Reconstruction and Stabilization (S/CRS) and USAID’s Office of Conflict Management and Mitigation (CMM), as a forum of experts, policy and program shapers to engage in broader discussions about evolving dynamics in Kyrgyzstan, and possible areas for the international community to constructively engage to prevent further violence and safeguard a peaceful transition.

Speakers

  • Nancy Lubin
    USIP Grantee
    President, JNA Associates, Inc.
  • Eric McGlinchey
    Assistant Professor of Politics and Government
    Department of Public and International Affairs, George Mason University
  • Sean Roberts
    Associate Professor of the Practice of International Affairs & Director
    International Development Studies Program, The Elliott School of International Affairs
    The George Washington University
  • Brent Hierman
    Doctoral Candidate
    Department of Political Science, Indiana University
  • Bridget Conley-Zilkic, Discussant
    Director of Research and Projects
    Committee on Conscience, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
  • Kathleen Kuehnast, Discussant
    Gender Advisor, Centers of Innovation
    United States Institute for Peace
  • Abiodun Williams, Moderator
    Vice President, Center for Conflict Analysis and Prevention
    United States Institute for Peace

Related Publications

China Looks to Fill a Void in Central Asia

China Looks to Fill a Void in Central Asia

Thursday, May 25, 2023

As the Group of Seven met at the end of last week in Hiroshima, Japan, China organized a summit with Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, marking a new chapter in Beijing’s engagement with the region. Central Asian states are looking for a new partner to help ensure their own security against domestic rebellions, as Russia’s war in Ukraine has limited Moscow’s ability to fulfill a longstanding role as a guarantor of domestic stability in the region. While most of the summit’s public discussion focused on economic and trade issues, China noted that it would help Central Asia enhance it’s law enforcement and security capabilities, which aligns with Beijing’s intensifying campaign for “global security.”

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Central Asia Needs a New Approach to Security

Central Asia Needs a New Approach to Security

Thursday, March 9, 2023

After three decades of independence following the fall of the Soviet Union, Central Asian countries continue to face challenges to their stability and governance. Last year saw large-scale domestic unrest in three of the region’s five countries — Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan — and a devastating cross-border conflict between Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan was the largest ever trans-boundary escalation in the region. Many of these events follow similar patterns: growing tensions and grievances among citizens lead to protests, which are met with a harsh and disproportionate response including the use of lethal force by security forces, feeding into further mistrust between authorities and the population.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & PreventionViolent Extremism

Blinken Debuts New U.S. Approach in Central Asia

Blinken Debuts New U.S. Approach in Central Asia

Thursday, March 2, 2023

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken visited Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan this week, where he signaled that Washington is changing tact in the region. For nearly two decades, U.S. engagement in the region focused on how it could help Washington in Afghanistan. Following the Afghanistan withdrawal, U.S. policy in Central Asia should be more modest, focused on helping these countries achieve balance in their relations with each other and the outside world, particularly in an era of great power competition. After all, these countries are neighbors of Russia and China and can’t afford to choose sides.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

View All Publications