Extremist violence and growing radicalization continue to present a serious challenge to Pakistan’s stability. As efforts to counter violent extremism grow in prominence, the drivers of radicalization and extremism and the means to undercut these drivers remain inadequately understood. On May 9, USIP convened a panel of experts on radicalization for a discussion examining what drives radicalization, and how to address these drivers through strategies to counter violent extremism.

Read the event coverage, The Challenges of Countering Radicalization in Pakistan

20120509-CounteringRadicalizationinPakistan-N

In March 2012 alone, Pakistan experienced 113 reported terrorist/insurgent attacks, resulting in 136 deaths and 185 injuries. Underpinning this violence is the growing radicalization among Pakistani youth which, while not always manifesting itself violently, presents a somber potential future indicator.

As the narrative emergent from Pakistan continues to be dominated by this steady march of violence and growing radicalization, counterterrorism research increasingly points to the need for broader and longer-term approaches to stemming terrorism/insurgency. In the U.S. and elsewhere, experts are turning to countering violent extremism (CVE), conceptualized by some as the means to undercut the ideological and rhetorical narratives which drive violent extremism. Counter-radicalization and de-radicalization measures are receiving more focus as an aspect of a holistic approach aimed specifically at those who may have already drifted towards extremist ranks. Pakistan’s first major attempt at this in recent years is the Sabaoon project, which works to de-radicalize young men who were part of the Pakistani Taliban that captured the Swat Valley in 2007.

On May 9, USIP convened a panel examining the CVE challenge in the Pakistani context. The event featured clips from a forthcoming documentary on the Sabaoon project and a talk by the project’s director, Dr. Feriha Peracha, as part of a broader discussion on CVE approaches in Pakistan which included experts on the psychology of extremism as well as on U.S. efforts at CVE.

USIP’s on-the-ground work in Pakistan in part addresses how to counter violent extremism through media interventions, work with civil society organizations, and research on the drivers of and response options to extremism. 

This event featured the following speakers:

  • Dr. Arie Kruglanski, panelist
    Distinguished Professor of Psychology
    University of Maryland
  • Vice Admiral Michael LeFever, panelist
    Deputy Director for Strategic Operational Planning
    U.S. National Counter Terrorism Center
  • Dr. Feriha Peracha, panelist
    Director and Supervising Psychologist
    Sabaoon School, Pakistan
  • Moeed Yusuf, moderator
    South Asia Adviser
    United States Institute of Peace

Explore Further

 Related Academy Courses

 

Related Publications

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

As Fragile Kashmir Cease-Fire Turns Three, Here’s How to Keep it Alive

Wednesday, February 21, 2024

At midnight on the night of February 24-25, 2021, India and Pakistan reinstated a cease-fire that covered their security forces operating “along the Line of Control (LOC) and all other sectors” in Kashmir, the disputed territory that has been at the center of the India-Pakistan conflict since 1947. While the third anniversary of that agreement is a notable landmark in the history of India-Pakistan cease-fires, the 2021 cease-fire is fragile and needs bolstering to be maintained.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Understanding Pakistan’s Election Results

Tuesday, February 13, 2024

Days after Pakistan’s February 8 general election, the Election Commission of Pakistan released the official results confirming a major political upset. Contrary to what most political pundits and observers had predicted, independents aligned with former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) won the most seats at the national level, followed by former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM). No party won an absolute majority needed to form a government on its own. The resultant uncertainty means the United States may have to contend with a government that is more focused on navigating internal politics and less so on addressing strategic challenges.

Type: Analysis

Global Elections & ConflictGlobal Policy

Tamanna Salikuddin on Pakistan’s Elections

Tamanna Salikuddin on Pakistan’s Elections

Monday, February 12, 2024

Surprisingly, candidates aligned with former Prime Minister Imran Khan won the most seats in Pakistan’s elections. But while voters “have shown their faith in democracy,” the lack of a strong mandate for any specific leader or institution “doesn’t necessarily bode well for [Pakistan’s] stability,” says USIP’s Tamanna Salikuddin.

Type: Podcast

The 2021 India-Pakistan Ceasefire: Origins, Prospects, and Lessons Learned

The 2021 India-Pakistan Ceasefire: Origins, Prospects, and Lessons Learned

Tuesday, February 6, 2024

The February 2021 ceasefire between India and Pakistan along the Line of Control in Kashmir has—despite occasional violations—turned into one of the longest-lasting in the countries’ 75-year shared history. Yet, as Christopher Clary writes, the ceasefire remains vulnerable to shocks from terrorist attacks, changes in leadership, and shifting regional relations. With the ceasefire approaching its third anniversary, Clary’s report examines the factors that have allowed it to succeed, signs that it may be fraying, and steps that can be taken to sustain it.

Type: Special Report

Peace Processes

View All Publications