As U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis visits Seoul and Tokyo this week, the region and the world are searching for signals about what President Donald Trump’s “America First” policy means for Asia. In a region that values stability above all, there is a growing uncertainty and nervousness about America’s commitment to its continued peace and prosperity.

South Korean Army soldier
Photo Courtesy of Flickr/Mathieu Thouvenin

South Korea and Japan are likely to seek assurances from Mattis that Washington will continue to play a reliable role as a leader and stabilizing force in the region. Trump has demonstrated a willingness to question long-standing policy assumptions, and in many cases, allies and partners fear the new administration will seek to “make deals” that might abandon or contradict previous reassurances, agreements or accepted practice.  

“Allies and partners will be looking for the United States to translate verbal assurances to action.”

President Trump has made statements that allies and partners say leave them guessing about his position on a number of issues, including the future of the U.S. military alliances with South Korea and Japan, the possibility that the two nations might acquire nuclear weapons of their own, and his strategy for countering the growing nuclear and missile threat from North Korea. He and his team also have prompted questions about the future of the One China Policy in relation to Taiwan and the U.S. role in the South China Sea.

In addition, Trump’s early decision to withdraw the U.S. from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement has left many puzzled about the economic role the United States wants to play in Asia.

As uncertainty about U.S. foreign policy swirls, Mattis has the opportunity to demonstrate that he, as Secretary of Defense, understands the nuances of the region and appreciates the importance of the U.S. role there. Through his confirmation process and early actions as secretary, Mattis has gone to some lengths to demonstrate that he has his own views on a range of issues, including the value of military alliances and the need to work with allies to counter a growing threat from North Korea – and these positions may reassure foreign and American audiences.

But South Korea and Japan will be searching for signs that Mattis’s outlook also is shared by the president.  If partners do not believe that Mattis speaks for the White House, his assurances will have little impact on an already skeptical audience.

The Pentagon has stressed that Mattis’s trip will “underscore the commitment of the United States to our enduring alliances with Japan and the Republic of Korea, and further strengthen U.S.-Japan-Republic of Korea security cooperation.” And despite the questions raised over the last few months, Trump recently reassured both South Korea and Japan by phone that the U.S. commitment to their security was “ironclad,” and that he seeks to deepen bilateral trade and investment relations with both countries.

This trip is an important step in defining the new administration’s policy toward Asia, but it is only the first step.  The bigger challenge will face Mattis when he returns home, as allies and partners will be looking for the United States to translate verbal assurances to action.

Related Publications

Report of the Expert Study Group on NATO and Indo-Pacific Partners

Report of the Expert Study Group on NATO and Indo-Pacific Partners

Monday, February 19, 2024

By: USIP Expert Study Group on NATO and Indo-Pacific Partners

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and its four partner countries in the Indo-Pacific—Australia, Japan, the Republic of Korea (ROK), and New Zealand—have entered a period of increased engagement. This engagement is taking shape in the context of the war waged by the Russian Federation (Russia) against Ukraine, NATO’s growing awareness of the security challenges posed by the People’s Republic of China (China), and important structural changes in the international system, including the return of strategic competition between the United States and China and Russia. It is occurring not only in bilateral NATO-partner relations but also between NATO and these Indo-Pacific countries as a group.

Type: Report

Conflict Analysis & PreventionCivilian-Military RelationsGlobal PolicyMediation, Negotiation & Dialogue

Two Years Later, What Has the Indo-Pacific Strategy Achieved?

Two Years Later, What Has the Indo-Pacific Strategy Achieved?

Thursday, February 15, 2024

By: Carla Freeman, Ph.D.;  Mirna Galic;  Daniel Markey, Ph.D.;  Vikram J. Singh

This month marks the second anniversary of the Biden administration’s Indo-Pacific Strategy (IPS). USIP experts Carla Freeman, Mirna Galic, Daniel Markey, and Vikram Singh assess what the strategy has accomplished in the past two years, how it has navigated global shocks and its impact on partnerships in the region.

Type: AnalysisQuestion and Answer

Global Policy

Japan-China Crisis Communications Are Improving but Face Challenges

Japan-China Crisis Communications Are Improving but Face Challenges

Wednesday, October 4, 2023

By: Yasuhiro Kawakami

The urgent need for improved crisis communications mechanisms between China and Japan has been driven home by a number of incidents between the two countries. For example, in January 2013 a Chinese navy vessel directed a fire-control radar at a Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force destroyer. A little over a year later, in May and June 2014, two Chinese military fighter aircraft flew unusually close to Japanese military aircraft. These incidents could have led to a much wider conflagration, particularly in the absence of a crisis communications mechanism.

Type: Analysis

Conflict Analysis & Prevention

How the Japan-China Hotline Can Help Stop Crisis from Turning into Conflict

How the Japan-China Hotline Can Help Stop Crisis from Turning into Conflict

Thursday, September 7, 2023

By: Michael MacArthur Bosack

For over a decade, confrontation over maritime administration and transit has increased the risk of security incidents between Japan and China. Disputes over territorial incursions, military movements and other activities have maintained consistent friction points between these regional neighbors, begging the question of how the two sides might mitigate tactical-level incidents from becoming strategic-level crises. To that end, on May 16, the two countries’ defense ministers held their first phone call across the newly established “Hotline between Japan-China Defense Authorities.” This culminated a years-long effort to establish a viable line of communication for information exchange and crisis management.

Type: Analysis

Global Policy

View All Publications